The problem with the election day registration is it makes fraud easy because town clerks became overwhelmed with trying to verify the voter information
The bill was strongly supported by town clerks, who said they have been overwhelmed by increasing numbers of voters who cast absentee ballots and who wait until Election Day to register. The measure also had the support of Secretary of State Charles Summers, whose office oversees elections in Maine.
House Speaker Robert Nutting, R-Oakland, applauded the bill's passage Monday.
"This bill will alleviate a significant amount of the growing stress on our election system by making minor changes to registration and absentee ballot deadlines," Nutting said. "These changes will go a long way toward maintaining the integrity of our voting system, while providing an open and accessible voting process for all Mainers."
Shultz goes on to criticize attempts to clean up the voter registration system directed at groups such as ACORN, who were convicted of using voter drives as a way to load the system with fake democratic voters.
These kinds of laws have a detrimental impact on all Americans, but they particularly affect minorities. The nonpartisan, nonprofit Project Vote has found that African-Americans and Latinos are more likely than white voters to register through a voter registration drive. That means that in Florida, where the League of Women Voters has halted its voter registration activities as a result of the new Republican law, fewer minority Americans will have the chance to register and vote.
"The non partisan Project Vote," is not non partisan. It's part of ACORN and as my friend Anita Moncreif testified to, Project Vote was very involved with trying to elect Democratic Candidates especially Barak Obama
. Some of the charges included:
- Project Vote development plan was to "approach maxed out presidential donors" and allegedly use the funds raised for voter registration drives
- ACORN "employees" were paid through Project Vote for partisan campaign activities, such as telling voters “don’t vote for Albert Wynn (sic) or vote for this person”
- In reality, there was no division between the staff of ACORN and Project Vote and persons working for one entity performed work for either or both organizations
- ACORN chose the states in which Project Vote would conduct voter registration drives, based on political considerations
- Registration drives (by Project Vote) conducted in 'battleground states" where “by coming in and registering new voters, it could change the outcome of the election”
- The Obama campaign’s donor list was part of the evidence admitted into the hearing on the injunction in October 2008
- ACORN Political is the ‘strategic planning arm’ of ACORN, and it looks at contested congressional districts, ballot measures, initiatives like minimum wage, etc.
- Project Vote had a $28,000,000 budget which was funneled through Citizens Consulting Incorporated (“CCI”)
Schultz proceeds to act like she has never read a newspaper:
Acorn has been charged or convicted of voter registration fraud in (by my count) 16 different states in recent years. Wassermann-Schultz is ignoring that fact (here is a partial list
). In the DNC Chair's own state, ACORN tried to register Mickey Mouse
For the best look at ACORN and its criminal activities, allow me to suggest Matthew Vadum's Book Subversion, Inc.
According to the Congresswoman guaranteeing an honest vote should not be a priority of government.
In Wisconsin, implementing photo ID requirements will cost the state at least $7 million, and the Institute for Southern Studies has estimated that North Carolina's photo ID bill would cost between $18 million and $25 million. As states continue to face billion-dollar budget deficits, lay off teachers, and shrink police departments, spending millions of public dollars for partisan gain is the height of irresponsibility. Despite the high price tag, the GOP has advanced photo ID mandates in more than 30 states. These laws would increase the barriers to voting for the 11 percent of Americans—including disproportionate numbers of elderly Americans and minorities—who lack the required ID.
The concept of one man one vote is essential to the freedoms of the American republic. Allowing people to vote more than once, or allowing people to vote who shouldn't partially disenfranchises those who are legally voting. The weight of the legal votes is watered-down by the inclusion of illegal votes. I would argue that protecting the concept of one man one vote should be a top priority of our government. But to Schultz and many progressives they call it racism in a desperate and illegal attempt to increase the number of Democratic voters.