New York Times Fails to Mention Gingrich Was Cleared Of Ethics Charges by John Sexton 29 Jan 2012 post a comment Share This: This is what real journalism looks like, folks. Sheryl Gay Stolberg writes a 2,300 word piece about Newt Gingrich's relationship to ethics charges (those brought by and against him) that ends with this rehash of his fall from grace: In the end, nearly all of the charges were dismissed. But the ethics committee did find that Mr. Gingrich had used tax-exempt money to promote Republican goals, and given the panel inaccurate information for its inquiry. Mr. Gingrich formally apologized, conceding he had brought discredit on the House. He had always regarded himself as a “transformative figure” who would change the course of history, but on Jan. 21, 1997, he made history in another way. The House voted 395-28 to reprimand him and fine him $300,000, making him the first speaker ever disciplined for unethical conduct. That's it. That's how the tale ends. It's as if they've quoted Newt's history but added an invisible ellipsis over the final portion of the story. This is a doctored quote of the record. This is "agenda journalism." Do you think it's relevant that after the events described above Democrats campaigned for a further investigation? Is it relevant that the IRS took them up on it, and that after more than three years determined that Newt did nothing wrong? Simply put, all the charges, even the ones Newt was reprimanded for, were bogus. Is any of that worth mentioning in a front page story on the topic at the New York Times? [youtube qMpBBRUCMd8] The real journalists at the NY Times have simply decided their readers don't need to know the rest of the story.