There has been a lot of chatter about the blockbuster report at the Daily Caller revealing the extent to which the self-proclaimed "media watchdog" outfit Media Matters for America is joined at the hip with the White House. Many are shocked at just how much Obama is seemingly programming the media with the supposedly independent Media Matters acting as its pipeline to the Old Media.
Shockingly, Daily Caller notes that MMFA is even holding teleconference briefings with members of Obama's administration and the subsequent salting of the results of those meetings among the Old Media's coverage seems to be a weekly occurrence. If true this is in contravention to MMFA's tax-exempt status, too.
The report points out that at least up until last fall, an Obama administration official participated in weekly strategy sessions to plan out what the Old Media should know about the Obama agenda. Daily Caller notes that Obama's recently resigned com director Jen Psaki was "a frequent participant" on those strategy calls.
Media Matters also began a weekly strategy call with the White House, which continues, joined by the liberal Center for American Progress think tank. Jen Psaki, Obama’s deputy communications director, was a frequent participant before she left for the private sector in October 2011.
Every Tuesday evening, meanwhile, a representative from Media Matters attends the Common Purpose Project meeting at the Capitol Hilton on 16th Street in Washington, where dozens of progressive organizations formulate strategy, often with a representative from the Obama White House.
Some may remember back in July of last year when several White House interoffice memos written by Psaki and other White House officials were discovered by Watchdog group Judicial Watch. The memos were filled with attacks on Fox News in general and Brett Baier in particular.
That moth, Fox News contributor Brett Baier wrote a story pointing out that the White House had specifically excluded them from being able to interview Treasury pay czar Ken Feinberg:
Emails released by Judicial Watch, obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request, show Deputy White House Communications Director Jennifer Psaki writing in reference to the dustup, "brett baier just did a stupid piece on it---but he is a lunatic." Another email from Psaki reads in part, "I am putting some dead fish in the fox cubby--just cause."
Other memos seemed to confirm that Obama's White House was going out of its way to exclude Fox News despite public claims to the contrary.
With the revelations about Psaki’s participation on MMFA strategy sessions, it makes clear the campaign against Fox News waged by the White House as well as Obama’s attempt to control the news media’s coverage.
Of course, this pipeline can go both ways, too. Is Media Matters pushing its own George Soros-funded, far left ideas on the Administration in these weekly strategy sessions? And how independent is MMFA if it is being included in strategy sessions led by the White House? This all too cozy relationship certainly eviscerates any expectation that MMFA's reports can be trusted. And with claims that MSNBC is fully programmed by the White House and MMFA, and that the Washington Post, Huffington Post, and the L.A. Times are also spoon-fed the Obama agenda on a daily basis, well, it calls into doubt everything in the Old Media's coverage of Barack Obama's White House.
But don't expect the Old Media to take this lying down. Already the media is attacking Daily Caller's exposé. Just today, for instance, in an attempt to undermine the DC series, Politico's Dylan Byers complained that many of the Daily Caller's quotes are from unnamed sources and saying that DC editor Tucker Carlson's piece does "not cite specific examples" to back up the allegations.
But, is this the same Politico that published over 100 stories based on unnamed sources and unfounded allegations -- most of which still haven’t been proven -- against Herman Cain, stories that contributed to his ultimate withdrawal from the race for the GOP nomination for president? You know it is.
In any case, as more of the DC's report emerges, what we see is a disturbing case of influence peddling among the media that calls into question everything we read about Barack Obama.