World View: Obama Echoes Truman Doctrine Pushing Syria Intervention
- Obama gives a surprisingly coherent defense of Syria intervention
- Senate Foreign Relations Committee approves military action in Syria
- Russia's president Putin accuses John Kerry of lying
- Iran's government splits over al-Assad's chemical weapons
Obama gives a surprisingly coherent defense of Syria intervention
Obama with Sweden's Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt in Stockholm on Wednesday
I listened to part of President Barack Obama's press conference in
Stockholm, Sweden, on Tuesday. He was asked a question about NSA
spying, and he rambled on for about 15
minutes without saying anything coherent. In the past couple of weeks
he's said one dumb thing after another about the situation in Syria and made a chaotic mess of American foreign policy.
So imagine my shock and surprise when he gave the clearest and
most coherent defense of U.S. military action that I've yet
heard when he was asked about Syria:
First of all, I didn’t set a red line; the world set
a red line. The world set a red line when governments
representing 98 percent of the world’s population said the use of
chemical weapons are abhorrent and passed a treaty forbidding
their use even when countries are engaged in war.
Congress set a red line when it ratified that treaty. Congress
set a red line when it indicated that -- in a piece of legislation
titled the Syria Accountability Act -- that some of the horrendous
things that are happening on the ground there need to be answered
And so when I said in a press conference that my calculus about
what’s happening in Syria would be altered by the use of the
chemical weapons, which the overwhelming consensus of humanity
says is wrong, that wasn’t something I just kind of made up. I
didn’t pluck it out of thin air. There’s a reason for it. That’s
point number one.
Point number two -- my credibility is not on the line. The
international community’s credibility is on the line. And America
and Congress’s credibility is on the line because we give lip
service to the notion that these international norms are
And when those videos first broke and you saw images of over 400
children subjected to gas, everybody expressed outrage: How can
this happen in this modern world? Well, it happened because a
government chose to deploy these deadly weapons on civilian
populations. And so the question is, how credible is the
international community when it says this is an international norm
that has to be observed? The question is, how credible is
Congress when it passes a treaty saying we have to forbid the use
of chemical weapons?
And I do think that we have to act, because if we don’t, we are
effectively saying that even though we may condemn it and issue
resolutions, and so forth and so on, somebody who is not shamed by
resolutions can continue to act with impunity. And those
international norms begin to erode. And other despots and
authoritarian regimes can start looking and saying, that’s
something we can get away with. And that, then, calls into
question other international norms and laws of war and whether
those are going to be enforced.
It's laughable that he claims he didn't set a red line, but that's
not why his response was coherent.
Obama's response is fully in the spirit of the Truman Doctrine, put forth by President
Harry Truman in 1947 and making the U.S. the Policeman of the World.
Truman's reasoning was that WW II was so expensive, and cost so many
lives, so intervening in the Greece/Turkey crisis of the time
would cost only a tiny fraction comparatively and would be well worth it if it
prevented a new world war. President John F. Kennedy repeated this
theme in his inaugural address.
Obama's reasoning is that the world must prevent the use of chemical
weapons, which could lead to a new world war, and that this justifies
American military action. This is a modern day justification that's
similar to the Truman Doctrine.
Unfortunately, President Obama earlier said so many dumb things, he
has little credibility left. And nobody knows what Obama's plans are
for Syria if he wins Congressional approval. White House
Senate Foreign Relations Committee approves military action in Syria
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has approved a resolution
giving U.S. President Barack Obama authority to take military action
against Syria over its use of chemical weapons on civilians. The
measure must pass both houses of Congress to become law and is
expected to face stiff opposition that splits both parties.
The Senate committee approved a plan that would give Obama authority
to order limited strikes against Syrian military targets for 60 days.
He could extend the window by another 30 days under certain
conditions. The resolution does not authorize the use of ground
troops. It states military action must be aimed at deterring and
preventing Syria from carrying out future chemical weapons attacks.
Russia's president Putin accuses John Kerry of lying
Russia's president Vladimir Putin, who is giving massive amounts of
advanced heavy military weaponry to Syria's psychopathic president
Bashar al-Assad for use in massacring civilian women and children, and
who feels free to order the invasion of Georgia or any other country
without getting permission from the U.N. Security Council,
on Wednesday accused U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry of
being a liar:
"I watched the debates in Congress. A congressman asks
Mr. Kerry: ‘Is al-Qaeda there?’ He says: ‘No, we are telling you
responsibly that they are not.' ...
[The Syrian rebels’] main combat unit is al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda
unit. They [the US] are aware of that. ... He [Kerry] lied. And he
knows that he lied. This is sad."
It turns out that Putin misquoted Kerry, but Putin is attacking the
United States, hoping to stop the bleeding of his own popularity
numbers which have been plummeting. Furthermore, Putin risks major
embarrassments on several issues this week with the G-20 summit
taking place in St. Petersburg.
It turns out that Russian public opinion is indifferent to the fate of
Syria's al-Assad regime but is extremely upset about a number of
other issues, including:
- Putin has imposed extremely punishing trade sanctions on
Ukraine in retaliation for Ukraine's moves toward signing an
association agreement with the European Union. This subject will be
mentioned by European countries attending the G-20 summit.
- Russia's Far East has experienced catastrophic flooding in August,
and Putin was slow to respond and did so ineffectively. (Think of
- Moscow is holding mayoral elections on Sunday, with implications
for all of Russia. Putin's candidate, Sergei Sobyanin, is being
threatened by an upset victory from opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
Putin is denying Navalny any media time, but he's gaining quickly
because of an effective grass-roots campaign. Putin's candidate is
expected to win anyway, in the same way that Putin's candidates won
the last couple of elections -- through massive corruption and vote
- As we reported yesterday,
Obama is snubbing Putin at the G-20 meeting but will meet with
Russian gay activists to embarrass Putin.
Ria Novosti and Jamestown
Iran's government splits over al-Assad's chemical weapons
Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has been a leading dissident in
Iran's government since the 2009 presidential elections but is still
highly revered as a hero of the Great Islamic Revolution of 1979.
Last week, Rafsanjani blamed Syria's president Bashar al-Assad for the
use of chemical weapons in a radio interview, as posted on an Iranian
news web site:
"The Syrian people have had more than 100 thousand
dead and eight million displaced inside and outside. The prisons
are full of people [and] have no more space, some have taken
stadiums and are filled. Bad circumstances rule the people. On
one side, the people are chemically bombarded by their own
government and from another side, today, must await American
Since this was far from Iran's policy, the remarks were taken down
from the web site and altered to say something completely different.
Rafsanjani may be in serious political trouble for having spoken the
truth. One MP is quoted:
"We are impatiently awaiting Mr. Hashemi
[Rafsanjani's] denial and plainly and correctly announcing his
position. We also request the Ministry of Intelligence to
investigate this matter and report the truth to the people. If
this tape is real ... [it means] that he seeks to weaken the
Resistance Front against the Dominant system, which of course is
untrue in my opinion."
Another MP said even more ominously:
"I have seen that speech's video and certainly the
video cannot be manufactured. Of course Hashemi [Rafsanjani]
stated those words and it is his opinion.
Perhaps Mr. Hashemi views the country's expediency in this, but
overall [one] must request explanation from him to plainly
announce his opinion.
Some have said that Mr. Hashemi's statements are a cooperation of
sorts with America, while it is not like this at all because
Mr. Hashemi condemns America. Perhaps Mr. Hashemi's opinion has
been that if the Syrian government used chemical weapons, we
condemn these measures but will not stop supporting Syria.
So long as the majority of the Syrian people support the
government, we will also support them. Supporting Syria is very
important for Iran because they are the Axis of Resistance, and in
case of their elimination [Lebanese] Hezbollah will no longer be
The Syrian government must implement the necessary reforms. If
from the beginning, it did not exhibit violence in reacting to the
protests of a section of the people, we would not have reached the
current point, but overall we considered the Assad government
acceptable by the majority, therefore we support
Iran is in a generational Awakening era (like America in the 1960s),
and although Rafsanjani is in the older generation of survivors of the
Great Islamic Revolution, he's been taking the positions of the
younger generations in Iran's Awakening era "generation gap." In the
2009 presidential election, several leaders supported the views of the
younger generation, and many of them were thrown into jail. Some of
them have never gotten out. Rafsanjani has survived so far, but one
of these days he's going to tell the truth once too often, and then
the Supreme Leader will do the equivalent of tying a cement block to
his leg and tossing him into the Caspian Sea or the Persian Gulf.
American Enterprise Institute and Reuters and American Enterprise Institute
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
Sweden, Fredrik Reinfeldt, Truman Doctrine, John F. Kennedy,
Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
Russia, Vladimir Putin, John Kerry,
Sergei Sobyanin, Alexei Navalny,
Iran, Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail