
How can you have a debate about climate, when the topic of the debate is out of bounds of polite conversation? At lunch I noted to colleagues that most (but not all) journalists seemed to disappear from the scientific session, and the zombies had wandered off to seek other brains to devour. Science seemed not to be the topic of interest, even when science was the actual topic.
by Dr. Christopher Essex10 Dec 2015, 2:04 PM PST0

If you think that no one would try to control what experts say, with intimidation tactics like climate trials, think again.
by Dr. Christopher Essex28 Sep 2015, 3:41 PM PST0

Members of the Scientific Council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) recently criticized the Royal Society’s positions on climate.
by Dr. Christopher Essex25 Mar 2015, 7:16 PM PST0

Healthy, effective scientific research requires the participation of trained people with many takes on a subject. Trying to eradicate the participation of those who do not share one politically approved view on climate has been a profitable political tactic, but it is completely destructive for science, which has been seriously damaged by climate activism.
by Dr. Christopher Essex5 Mar 2015, 5:47 PM PST0