Pork Report October 20, 2009: Are Political Scientists Relevant?

Today’s edition identifies at least $333 million in wasteful Washington spending.

-$300 million stimulus program to promote energy efficiency may not be energy efficient after all, audit finds

-Quid Pro Pork: Department of Justice investigates link between the exchange of congressional earmarks and campaign donations

-Washington, DC, city government steered $4.5 million in federal funds to an AIDS housing group that never filed federal tax returns and has been plagued with service and cost complaints

-DC mayor launches investigation of groups that misspent more than $25 million of public AIDS assistance

Political scientists debate the relevancy of the research they conduct with federal funds; “We’re kidding ourselves if we think this research typically has the obvious public benefit we claim for it.”

-National Science Foundation funds political science study of online town hall meetings held by Members of Congress

-UC Davis grossly inflated the number of campus-related sexual assaults to reap more than $1 million in grants for violence prevention

-Delaware receives $2.3 million in federal funds to enhance and expand its sandy beaches

-Feds investigating the possible misuse of crime prevention funds by Oklahoma City

COMMENTS

Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.