Obama Ducks Question on Warrant Requests Denied by FISA Court

Obama Ducks Question on Warrant Requests Denied by FISA Court

In a lengthy interview with Charlie Rose Monday evening, Barack Obama did his best to reassure the American people that he is not Dick Cheney. However, Obama’s entire defense of a surveillance program that has only grown under Obama’s watch is that he set up a number of checks and balances, specifically through a FISA court that would have to approve warrant requests:

Charlie Rose: So I hear you saying, I have no problem with what NSA has been doing.

Barack Obama: Well, let me — let me finish, because I don’t. So, what happens is that the FBI — if, in fact, it now wants to get content; if, in fact, it wants to start tapping that phone — it’s got to go to the FISA court with probable cause and ask for a warrant.

That sounds really good, right? It’s all okay because a court won’t allow the government to abuse the warrant process and just snoop on our calls willy-nilly. But then Rose asks Obama the only question that matters, which Obama conspicuously ducks:

Charlie Rose: But has FISA court turned down any request?

Barack Obama: The — because — the — first of all, Charlie, the number of requests are surprisingly small… number one. Number two, folks don’t go with a query unless they’ve got a pretty good suspicion.

Here is the thing: If the FISA court is not turning down warrant requests, it is nothing more than fascist window dressing-a rubber stamp. And this is the likely reason Obama ducked the question:

[The FISA court] last rejected a request back in 2009, and that was only one out of 1320. In its entire history, since 1979, the court has rejected a grand total of 11 applications. 11. Out of 33,939 applications. That’s 0.03%. Not 3%. 0.03% with not a single rejection in over three years. That’s not careful review. That’s a rubber stamp

One warrant of 1320 turned down by the FISA court.

Out of 33,939 requests, the FISA court has only rejected 11.

The reason polls show Obama has a growing credibility problem with the American public is because his arrogant, sanctimonious rhetoric has painted him into a corner. He is not who he said he was — not even close.

When the media was cheerleading his campaign in 2008, we were assured Obama would be different. I guess that what the media meant by different was fewer jobs, a larger deficit, increased surveillance, and more wars.

 

Follow  John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC      

Read More Stories About:

Big Government, Twitter, Defense, Charlie Rose


Comment count on this article reflects comments made on Breitbart.com and Facebook. Visit Breitbart's Facebook Page.

Like Breitbart on Facebook

FROM THE HOMEPAGE





From Our Partners