Conservatives have drawn a bull’s eye on the immigration bill passed by the US Senate, insisting the landmark measure will fail as is and vowing political retribution against Republicans who voted for it.
The bipartisan immigration reform bill passed 68-32 in the Senate on Thursday with support from 14 Republicans, many of whom now face accusations they let down conservatives opposed to legislation that lays a pathway to citizenship for 11 million undocumented people.
Those lawmakers, including high-profile figures like Senator Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), “will have to go back home and explain the votes they cast, and explain to their constituents why it’s not amnesty, even though it is,” Dan Holler of Heritage Action, a lobbying arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation, told AFP on Friday.
The four Republicans who joined four Democrats in crafting the legislation were well aware of the potential political pitfalls, perhaps none more than Rubio, a potential 2016 presidential candidate who has been a darling of the small-government tea party movement.
Conservatives worry about the bill’s $46 billion price tag, and they are skeptical about a Congressional Budget Office report which estimated that the bill would lead to dramatic deficit reduction.
Equally important, many see the Senate making the same mistakes that plagued the 1986 legislation, when Congress approved an amnesty for three million undocumented workers on the condition that border security and enforcement was tightened.
Those conditions were never met, and millions more slipped illegally across the US-Mexico border or overstayed their visas. Conservative lawmakers now warn that immigration reform is doomed if it once again puts legalization before border security.
Obama, on a trip in Africa, called House Speaker Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) in a bid to nudge him to take up immigration reform.
Boehner has already said the chamber will not take up the Senate bill but seek to pass its own legislation with tougher border security measures.
House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte insists on a piecemeal approach, and his committee has approved four bills, including one that gives state and local government broad interior enforcement powers.
But the most controversial element of potential reform, what to do with 11 million people living in the shadows, has yet to be addressed.
Lawmakers headed back to their districts for a week-long break, and some Republicans like Tennessee’s Senator Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) will find the welcome mat missing.
Corker co-authored the pivotal amendment that dramatically boosts border security, and while his important role helped bring some skeptical Republicans on board, it angered hard-line conservatives.
Some tea party activists have openly called for conservatives to challenge Republican Senators in upcoming primary elections if they voted for the “amnesty” bill.
The party’s 2012 presidential candidate Mitt Romney was ridiculed when he said “self-deportation” was a viable policy for illegal immigrants.
But even after Obama won re-election and Republican leaders called for outreach to minority groups like Hispanics, die-hard conservatives have largely resisted the Senate’s immigration reform.
And yet immigration reform obstructionists could face their own backlash.