Toys-R-Us: “I’m Whoopi Goldberg and I love kids.”
The View: “I know it wasn’t rape-rape. … It was something else but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.”
Are those who declare themselves “child advocates” required to go through some sort of accreditation or licensing program in California? Because if they are, maybe Whoopi missed the part about actually “advocating” for children, as opposed to, say…. millionaire, celebrity child-rapists.
Here’s the definition of “advocate”: to speak or write in favor of; support or urge by argument;
I must lack the sophistication necessary to understand how this works, but it doesn’t sound like “child advocacy” to me when someone argues on national television that drugging and sodomizing a thirteen year-old girl against her will doesn’t meet the definition of rape. Or could it be that Whoopi’s definition of advocacy is to “speak in favor of” splitting hairs for those who do irreparable damage to children?
Maybe it’s me. Maybe if I spent more time in Hollywood I would … understand.
Comment count on this article reflects comments made on Breitbart.com and Facebook. Visit Breitbart's Facebook Page.