On July 17, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post claimed Rush Limbaugh said the super villain in the new Batman movie is a “liberal attack on Romney.”
Farhi’s headline reads, “Rush Limbaugh claims ‘Dark Knight’ movie is liberal attack on Romney,” but the truth is, of course, that Rush, did not say that the terrorist character Bane in the soon-to-debut Batman movie is meant as an underhanded slap at Mitt Romney. He just didn’t.
My guess is that Farhi only briefly scanned the transcript of Rush’s comments about the Batman movie made during his July 17 show because tone is telling when you actually hear the Rush’s comments as I did when the show was on the air. Rush was not saying that the movie was planned as an attack on Mitt but that some pundits were making such a claim. He was also ambivalent on the whole thing.
Rush did note that many “brain-dead people” will hear the name Bane and then immediately think of Romney’s association with Bain Capital, but he did not say that this was the purpose of the character in the movie, as Farhi leads readers to think.
Rush’s tone is not readily apparent in the written transcript of the segment that was posted to his website but when you listen, it is far more evident that he wasn’t stating the Bane-as-Romney allegation as fact. But, Farhi takes a few sentences of Rush’s comments out of context to make it seem like Rush was saying that the Batman bad guy is a swipe at Romney nonetheless.
All Fahri says of Rush’s comments past the headline is at the end of his piece.
“The movie has been in the works for a long time, the release date’s been known, summer 2012 for a long time,” he said. “Do you think that it is accidental, that the name of the really vicious, fire-breathing, four-eyed, whatever-it-is villain in this movie is named Bane?”
He added, “This movie, the audience is going to be huge, lot of people are going to see the movie. And it’s a lot of brain-dead people, entertainment, the pop-culture crowd. And they’re going to hear ‘Bane’ in the movie, and they are going to associate Bain. And the thought is that when they start paying attention to the campaign later in the year, and Obama and the Democrats keep talking about Bain, not Bain Capital, but Bain, Romney and Bain, that these people will think back to the Batman movie –‘Oh yeah, I know who that is.’ There are some people who think it will work…Others think — “You’re really underestimating the America n people who think that will work.”
First of all, at the beginning of his Batman segment, Rush was asking his audience if it was “accidental,” not stating that it wasn’t accidental. He was asking his audience what they thought, not telling them what he thought.
Additionally, Farhi conveniently leaves out the following quote that puts context to Rush’s comments.
So, anyway, this evil villain in the new Batman movie is named Bane. And there’s now a discussion out there as to whether or not this is purposeful and whether or not it will influence voters.
Rush was telling his audience that “there’s now a discussion” on the matter. Guess when Rush said that? It was the very sentence before Farhi begins to quote Rush. Convenient that Farhi sort of forgot that part?
In the end, it is the current discussion about the movie that was Rush’s topic. He made no direct assertion that the movie and character were a purposeful attack on Romney.
Rush ends this way:
You may think it’s ridiculous, I’m just telling you this is the kind of stuff the Obama team is lining up. The kind of people who would draw this comparison are the kind of people that they are campaigning to. These are the kind of people that they are attempting to appeal to.
Rush did say that some stupid people might, indeed, draw the comparison. But nowhere did Rush say that he thinks the movie makers meant to equate the evil Bane character to Mitt Romney. Rush was just relating what “some people” were talking about this week.