As some Republicans cave in to Democratic bullying (Bill Kristol on taxes, anyone?), other young Republicans are following their lead and caving in to pressure from those who condemn opinions that might inflame their conservatism. The College Republicans of Fordham University, a Jesuit university, have canceled an appearance by Ann Coulter that was scheduled for November 29.
Coulter’s appearance would have been the first time an avowed conservative addressed the student body. When the College Republicans announced the event, they were attacked not only by students on campus, but most egregiously, by the university president, Joseph McShane. Incredibly, McShane sent a public email to students, alumni, and faculty excoriating the College Republicans for inviting her to speak and encouraging everyone to oppose her:
The College Republicans, a student club at Fordham University, has invited Ann Coulter to speak on campus on November 29. The event is funded through student activity fees and is not open to the public nor the media. Student groups are allowed, and encouraged, to invite speakers who represent diverse, and sometimes unpopular points of view, in keeping with the canons of academic freedom. Accordingly, the University will not block the College Republicans from hosting their speaker of choice on campus.
To say that I am disappointed with the judgment and maturity of the College Republicans, however, would be a tremendous understatement. There are many people who can speak to the conservative point of view with integrity and conviction, but Ms. Coulter is not among them. Her rhetoric is often hateful and needlessly provocative–more heat than light–and her message is aimed squarely at the darker side of our nature. As members of a Jesuit institution, we are called upon to deal with one another with civility and compassion, not to sling mud and impugn the motives of those with whom we disagree or to engage in racial or social stereotyping. In the wake of several bias incidents last spring, I told the University community that I hold out great contempt for anyone who would intentionally inflict pain on another human being because of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or creed. “Disgust”was the word I used to sum up my feelings about those incidents. Hate speech, name-calling, and incivility are completely at odds with the Jesuit ideals that have always guided and animated Fordham.
Still, to prohibit Ms. Coulter from speaking at Fordham would be to do greater violence to the academy, and to the Jesuit tradition of fearless and robust engagement. Preventing Ms. Coulter from speaking would counter one wrong with another. The old saw goes that the answer to bad speech is more speech. This is especially true at a university, and I fully expect our students, faculty, alumni, parents, and staff to voice their opposition, civilly and respectfully, and forcefully.
The College Republicans have unwittingly provided Fordham with a test of its character: do we abandon our ideals in the face of repugnant speech and seek to stifle Ms. Coulter’s (and the student organizers’) opinions, or do we use her appearance as an opportunity to prove that our ideas are better and our faith in the academy-and one another-stronger? We have chosen the latter course, confident in our community, and in the power of decency and reason to overcome hatred and prejudice.
This is the real danger facing the Republic: the attempts by liberals to bully conservatives into silence. McShane has no place taking sides, and the College Republicans should have stood tall and told him exactly where he could stick his email.