Skip to content

If You're Writing Primarily About Politics, What You're Not Doing Is Writing Primarily About People

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

In response to Some Reviewers Turned Off by the Politics of Elysium:

People are complex and surprising.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Politics — to someone who has a firm belief in a certain politics — are simple and obvious.

As a movie moves towards the “simple and obvious” away from the “complex and surprising,” it’s little wonder it becomes less interesting.

Even among liberals — and most critics are Severely liberal, as Mitt Romney might say — there is something akin to The Matrix phenomenon at play. 

Agent Smith said the first Matrix, a Matrix unseen in the film, was a paradise, without strife or pain or ugliness or death.

And the human brain-slaves of the Matrix rejected it — they knew it wasn’t real.  So they added in, well, 200o’s era Los Angeles, and that did the trick.  Now the human brain-slaves believed the illusion.  It had grit. It had trash.  It had discord.

Even a Severely Liberal critic might balk when “The Matrix” a filmmaker presents to him is such a pandering, simplistic conception of the messy thing we call The Real World.  Even a Severely Liberal critic might miss that feel of grit in a movie.  Something that feels like it was conceived by a human being as an entertainment for other human beings, and not by a socialist-minded AI who’s just dying to tell you about this great screenplay idea he has.

 

By the Way:  I just had the odd feeling that I didn’t make up that Matrix thing, that either you or John Haywood did, and now I’m just repeating back to you what you’ve already written.

If so, I’m sorry.  I don’t remember reading it, but now I’m kind of wondering if that tumbled out a bit too easily, as if from memory rather than through creation.


Comment count on this article reflects comments made on Breitbart.com and Facebook. Visit Breitbart's Facebook Page.