Ronald Reagan told the story of a benefit stealing “welfare queen” back in 1976 to argue for smaller, leaner government. Liberals have complained about the generalization ever since. Paul Krugman called it a “bogus story” as recently as 2007.
It turns out there was a real welfare queen, and that name was given to her by the Chicago Tribune, not Ronald Reagan. According to an excellent piece by Josh Levin for Slate, stealing welfare under false names may have been the least of her crimes:
When I set out in search of Linda Taylor, I hoped to find the real story
of the woman who played such an outsize role in American politics–who
she was, where she came from, and what her life was like before and
after she became the national symbol of unearned prosperity. What I
found was a woman who destroyed lives, someone far more depraved than
even Ronald Reagan could have imagined. In the 1970s alone, Taylor was
investigated for homicide, kidnapping, and baby trafficking. The
detective who tried desperately to put her away believes she’s
responsible for one of Chicago’s most legendary crimes, one that remains
unsolved to this day. Welfare fraud was likely the least of the welfare
Linda Taylor (one of dozens of aliases she used) was likely a psychopath who was never held accountable for her worst crimes. But in the 1970s, when she became part of a national debate, she had defenders who saw her as a victim:
For much of the 1970s, Taylor had consistent legal representation from celebrated black Chicago attorney R. Eugene Pincham.
In the run-up to Taylor’s welfare fraud trial, Pincham–who managed to
delay the proceedings for years, winning continuance after
continuance–positioned his client as a victim of coldhearted,
overreaching prosecutors. “It would be a pretty sorry situation if the
state tried to prosecute and send to jail everybody from the South Side
that took welfare money they didn’t have coming,” he told the Tribune
in 1976. “There’d just be nowhere to put them.” Prosecutors, meanwhile,
called Taylor a “parasitic growth,” a leech who gleefully extracted
Calling her a “parasitic growth” is probably too kind it turns out. There is much in the story that is hair-raising. I won’t spoil it with an excerpt. When you have 30 minutes it is very much worth reading. That this woman is remembered as a “welfare queen” turns out to be far too kind a legacy.