Arid Uka made the news again recently. Uka is a Balkan Muslim whose heart and mind we won with American blood and treasure when we hunted down and killed the Serbians who, for some reason, couldn’t get along with the Religion of Peace. And so to thank the American Servicemen who died and fought for his right to jihad freedom, Uka found some American Airmen in Germany, slaughtered two of them, and wounded others.
Uka appeared in German court and reportedly confessed that a jihadist video which incorporated clips from the 2007 film, Redacted, helped inspire him to slaughter the Airmen.
Christian Toto noted the significance of this admission at Big Hollywood. Toto also insinuated that while Hollywoodists such as, “. . . Elizabeth Banks, Roger Ebert, Patton Oswalt and Michael Moore twisted the blame game for partisan reasons, using their Twitter accounts to accuse Sarah Palin of inspiring the Tucson shooter without a shred of evidence,” he doesn’t expect the same treatment for Redacted director Brian De Palma and others associated with the film. In fact, Toto even notes that The Daily Caller contacted Redacted producer Jason Kilot and Kilot had this to say on the matter:
“I don’t see how people would be made to commit acts of violence [after watching “Redacted”], any more than they would for watching Fox News,” Kriot [sic] said.
That’s a perfectly logical statement. A movie smearing American Troops as semi-human monsters is no different than Fox News. I’m no fan of Fox News, of course. Sure it’s less leftist than the rest of the networks, but it’s still a leftist network and helps advance the leftist agenda (albeit in less noticeable ways). Nevertheless, I’d be embarrassed to make the statement that Kilot did. I’m sure he’s not, though. Being a leftist means never having to say you’re sorry . . . or that you have an ounce of decency.
Yet at the same time, I find it hard to generate a whole lot of outrage with Kilot or the other Redacted filmmakers. After all, no one really is that offended or outraged with all the filth that Hollywood produces. Otherwise Hollywood would have been out of business a long time ago.
So, sure, what Kilot said was a giant middle finger to America and particularly American Servicemen, but he did it with a smirk on his face because he knew that he and the rest of the Democrat-Hollywood complex could get away with it; he knew that the American public would continue giving them their hard-earned money no matter what he said.
So I’m not calling on Kilot, Redacted director Brian De Palma, or Redacted producer Mark Cuban (he’s cool, since he just throws a few dollars at the Troops to cover for his deeds) to apologize for their film and their general hatred for good.
Instead, I suggest that conservatives start churning out stories and other entertainment that has a philosophy of, “If you want a war, leftists, we’ll gladly give it to you.” And on that note, here is an example of what I mean.
*****
The Hollywoodists
Jason drove his Hummer to meet with Brian and Mark. He sighed as he arrived at the studio offices. Life had been tough for him lately. Why just the other day he had lost electricity at his home for five hours. It was like he was living in the stone ages. But what should he expect? He had helped the country elect a president he had hoped would change it for the better, but instead all they got was another too conservative president who, along with the conservative mainstream media, refused to advance the progressive agenda.
Jason entered an office and Brian and Mark were already there. They had scheduled a meeting for today so they could discuss what their next film project would be. They had to choose between two options.
The first film would tell how an artist overcame a repressive, conservative upbringing (that caused him depression which he suffers with to this day–alcoholism, etc.) to become a successful pornographer and a leader in protecting free speech. The second film would be a movie about how American Servicemen are murderous thugs who should be viewed at all times as potential, right-wing terrorists who also slaughter innocent, dark-skinned Muslims. The three decided on the second movie option.
The reason Jason, Brian, and Mark considered both movie projects was simple. They looked at the first option because they lived such easy and indulgent lives that they had to invent problems for themselves and tear into the institutions and families that gave them their pampered existences. Doing so made them feel special. And Jason, Brian, and Mark looked at (and chose) the second film option because they were cowards at heart, and thus they had to destroy that which reminded them of their cowardice. Or, as Elizabeth Kantor puts it on page 6 of The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature (as she discusses the left’s revulsion of Beowulf):
. . . Beowulf is full to the brim with ideas and attitudes that are exactly opposite to the postmodernist intellectuals’ beliefs about the world. The typical English professor hardly wants his students learning the kinds of things you can learn from Beowulf: for example, to admire war heroes, to prefer the tried and true to the trendy and radical, to see Christianity as a powerful civilizing force, and–possibly worst of all–to ask what’s wrong with the clever man who hates the warrior (who’s a better man than he is).
Jason, Brian, and Mark initiated the anti-American-military movie but during filming they learned that the story upon which they drew much material was entirely fabricated. Furthermore, they learned that the story’s writer was a complete loser who lied about being in the Armed Forces until he couldn’t lie about it any longer. But this didn’t stop them. They publicly stated that none of the revelations mattered because, after all, they were “just making a story intended to make people think.” Then, after they finished filming and editing, they released the film to much controversy . . . controversy which they used to declare themselves martyrs.
Epilogue: A few months after they released the film, Jason, Brian, and Mark sat in a dark-filled room and smoked cigars as they rubbed their hands together sinisterly. (Note: Yes, I realize this is stereotypically evil. But remember, we’re just using our story to reciprocate to how the Hollywoodists have portrayed us.) The three came together to celebrate a victory: a Muslim has gone on a rampage and killed American Servicemen, inspired to do so by a jihadist video that incorporated clips of their anti-American-military film. Their comments about wanting “to make people think” with their movie were entirely false. Instead, their true goal was to achieve what they had achieved when the jihadist went on his rampage: to defame the American Serviceman so badly that people actually went out and killed them on their behalf.
*****
And this would be my type of response to Jason Kilot, Brian De Palma, Mark Cuban, and the rest of the Democrat-Hollywood complex that continues its war against its enemies. As I mentioned, I have no desire for them to apologize or hide who they truly are. I have a desire to fight back and defeat them. And what would I say if someone used my story to inspire someone else to commit violence against the Hollywoodists? Why I’d simply respond as thus: “Hollywood movies… show the nature of Hollywood. There is nothing more incendiary about telling the truth of what is happening in Hollywood.”
There are many more stories that need told too–stories told in response to the decades of crap that the Democratic-Hollywood complex has heaped upon the once great America. And since no one else is putting out anything close to what I would like to see–since the Right continues with its we-can’t-hate-back-or-let-them-goad-us-into-war mentality–then maybe it is time to start writing my own stories that fight back against the left and its war on all that is good.
COMMENTS
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.