How the U.S. National Security Apparatus is Imposing the Islamic Law of Slander on American Citizens and Aiding & Abetting the Enemy
U.S. War fighting doctrine requires we analyze an enemy beginning with (1) who the enemy says he is, and (2) why he states he is fighting us. From there, the enemy’s threat doctrine is identified, studied and taught to those who have national security and war fighting responsibilities so the enemy can be defeated.
The United States has been engaged in a war since 9/11/2001 in which 100% of the enemy states they are “Muslims fighting Jihad in the Cause of Allah in order to impose Shariah (Islamic Law) on the entire world.” Violent Jihadi organizations such as Al Qaeda, Hamas, and others make clear their strategic objective is to re-establish the Global Islamic State (Caliphate) under which Shariah (Islamic Law) is the law of the land. All Islamic nations (Head of State level), via the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s (OIC’s) Cairo Declaration define human rights as the imposition of Shariah. The Cairo Declaration was served as an official document to the United Nations in 1993.
Hence, when OIC nations say they seek to spread human rights throughout the world, they are stating their objective is a world governed by Shariah. It is a matter of fact the most prominent Islamic organizations in North America are controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) whose stated goals (in their By-Law, Strategic documents, etc) are (1) the re-establishment of the Caliphate (by force when needed); (2) under which Shaiah is the law of the land. Therefore, our enemy is fighting a Total War in which Shariah (Islamic Law) serves as the basis of their stated threat doctrine, which they seek to impose on the entire world.
Even if Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the leaders of Islamic nations are wrong about the requirements of Islamic Law, they continue to use it to wage war against us and, therefore, by our own war fighting doctrine, it constitutes a key element of the enemy threat doctrine.
100% of all published Islamic Law – and yes, it is published and authoritative – makes Jihad a permanent obligation on all Muslims until the entire world is subordinated to Islamic Law. All published Islamic Law only defines Jihad as warfare against non-Muslim. No bona fide published Islamic Law differs from this. Our enemy knows this to be true.
Those are the facts.
Had the professional standard inside the U.S. National Security apparatus been maintained regarding the identification of the threat from the Islamic Movement after 9/11, it would be standard protocol inside the bureaucracy of the U.S. government to teach the basics of Islamic Law, as it relates to terrorism, to all new military officers, federal agencies, U.S. Attorneys Offices, and the like. However, that, sadly, is not the case.
In fact, those who teach these facts are being systematically purged from the government sector by the very agencies whose reason for existence is to pursue facts to find the truth in order to enforce the Constitutional laws of these United States. The Muslim Brotherhood calls this “Civilization Jihad” by our hands – getting our leadership to do the Muslim Brotherhood’s bidding for them – in this case, silencing those presenting facts about the enemy threat doctrine.
The Islamic Law of Slander
In 14th century Islamic Sacred Law (Shariah) – Umdat al Salik – published today in English in Beltsville, Maryland (“Reliance of the Traveller”), “Slander” is defined as follows: “Slander means to mention anything concerning a person (Muslim) that he would dislike.” A truthful statement about Shariah which a Muslim does not want you to know or teach others is considered “Slander” in Islamic Law, and can be punishable by death. The international campaign launched by the OIC to have “Islamophobia” criminalized through official international channels, including the United Nations, is having a direct impact on local, state and federal law enforcement in the United States as the truthful, yet “offensive” information about Shariah is being kept from many of them – not by the Muslim Brotherhood, but by U.S. government officials acting on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Should We Understand Shariah? Is it a Threat?
Is Shariah (Islamic Law) really an imminent threat here in America? We know it is the very reason the enemy acts, and it is what the enemy uses to drive what he does. So let’s look at some evidence (read: “Facts”).
In June 2009, Carlos Bledsoe, who previously converted to Islam and changed his name to Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, drove to the Army Recruiting Center in Little Rock, Arkansas and shot and killed Private William A. (“Andy”) Long, and wounded Private Quinton Ezeagwula. The U.S. government did not pursue this as a “Terrorism” matter, but let the local police and prosecutors handle it as a drive-by shooting. Abdulhakim Muhammad was “radicalized” at the Islamic Center of Nashville, a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, and trained for jihad in Yemen. The FBI was aware of his arrest in Yemen, and sent an agent from the Nashville Field Office to interview him.
The police report from the shooting revealed Muhammad “stated that he was a practicing Muslim … that he was mad at the U.S. military because of what they had done to Muslims in the past.” Muhammad called the circuit court judge a “tyrant” and said he had no jurisdiction over him – which is true under Islamic Law. In a letter to the judge he said, “This was a Jihadi attack on infidel forces.” It doesn’t get clearer than that. Asked why this case was being prosecuted in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, a Justice Department spokesman stated: “Given that the capital murder case against Carlos Bledsoe, aka Abdulhakim Muhammad, is a matter of pending litigation in Arkansas, we refer you to the prosecutors handing the case in Arkansas for any comments on this matter.” Private Andy Long was killed by a Jihadi on the streets of America by the same enemy we are fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and elsewhere. He is deserving of a Purple Heart and should be remembered as a warrior.
In October 2009, Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah of the Masjid Al-Haqq in Detroit, Michigan was shot and killed by FBI agents during a raid to arrest him. The affidavit for the arrest of Abdullah makes clear he and his organization believed in the imposition of Shariah here in the United States. The affidavit states, in part, “Abdullah…is a highly placed leader of a nationwide radical fundamentalist Sunni (Islamic) group consisting primarily of African-Americans…Their primary mission is to establish a separate, sovereign Islamic State (“Ummah”) within the borders of the United States, governed by Shariah law… Luqman Abdullah calls his followers to offensive jihad… (an FBI Source) heard Luqman Abdullah advocate the spread of Islam through violent jihad and violence against the United States government and against law enforcement… (FBI Source) participated in regular firearms and martial arts training inside Masjid al-Haqq (the mosque).”
It is important to note Luqman Abdullah was also on the Majlis al Shura for the Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), a Muslim Brotherhood front organization made up primarily of African-American converts to Islam. MANA is led by Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing. As an Imam, Abdullah was trained in Islamic Law, a requirement for anyone sitting on the Majlis al Shura of any Islamic organization, and, therefore, was likely significantly knowledgeable about Islamic Law and it’s requirements.
In November of this same year (2009), Major Nidal Malik Hassan, an officer in the U.S. Army who was Muslim, killed fourteen people at Ft. Hood, Texas. Hassan was described by all who know him as a “devout Muslim,” and he was the acting Lay Muslim Chaplain for Ft. Hood. Prior to beginning his killing spree, which he declared to his fellow officers to be a “jihad,” Hassan stood on a table and shouted “Allahu Akhbar” because it is a requirement in Islamic Law that a Jihadi announce himself before he acts. Prior to the FBI ever arriving on the scene at Ft. Hood, they publicly stated this was not an act of terrorism.
On at least 20 occasions, Major Hassan gave a PowerPoint presentation to his fellow officers detailing the requirements of Islamic Law. Specifically, he stated if he were ever to be put in a position to have to kill another Muslim – i.e. deploy overseas to Iraq or Afghanistan – he would act violently (jihad). His presentations were based strictly on Shariah and its requirements for jihad. Major Hassan’s presentation is doctrinally correct with regard to Islamic Law. In fact, it explicitly served as the basis for why he acted. The official U.S. government after action report on the Ft Hood shooting failed to mention the words Jihad, Shariah, Muslim, “Islamic Movement,” or others, and even failed use Hassan’s name.
In May of 2010 Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a vehicle bomb in Time Square in New York City. In October 2010, Shahzad appeared in Federal Court to be sentenced, and was given an opportunity to speak. Shahzad stated, in part: “If I am given a thousand lives, I will sacrifice them all for the sake of Allah fighting this cause, defending our lands, making the word of Allah supreme over any religion or system. We Muslims don’t abide by human-made laws, because they are always corrupt… I say to them, we don’t accept your democracy nor your freedom, because we already have Sharia law and freedom… the defeat of U.S. is imminent and will happen in the near future, inshallah, which will only give rise to much awaited Muslim caliphate, which is the only true world order.” Shahzad is clear he is fighting Jihad in the Cause of Allah in order to impose Shariah on the world.
Many will remember the late fall of 2010 when Mohamed Osman Mohamud was arrested for attempting to detonate a vehicle bomb in Portland, Oregon during a Christmas Tree lighting ceremony. In the affidavit for the complaint against Mohamud, he was frequently quoted for his desire to wage “violent jihad” against America, and wrote an email stating, “Make prayer that I will be the one to open Al Quds and make prayer that I will be a martyr in the highest chambers of paradise.” The affidavit further noted Mohamud published an article in the April 2009 issue of “Jihad Reflections” magazine where he wrote the “Mujahid…must fulfill the obligation of preparing himself physically for jihad.” Mohamud read a Hadith (account of the life of Mohammed and a key component of the formation of Islamic Law) and then dreamed about jihad training in Yemen. At the moment of his arrest, Mohamud shouted, “Allahu Akhbar” (God is greatest), fulfilling the Islamic legal requirement that a Jihadi announce himself.
How can the enemy be so clear about why he fights, and yet our national security leadership remain so blind? While there are a host of answers to this question, one critical answer lies in the fact our leaders are being advised by and working with the Muslim Brotherhood who tells them how to conduct international diplomacy, wage the overseas wars, and create the domestic counterterrorism strategy at home.
Facts in Evidence
The largest terrorism finance and Hamas trial successfully prosecuted in U.S. history was United States v Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (hereafter “HLF“). The case was adjudicated in the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) in 2008, and HLF and its leadership were convicted of sending over 12 million dollars to Hamas overseas. HLF was created by the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. to be one of three front organizations for Hamas. Hamas is the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine, and is a designated terrorist organization by the U.S. government. At the time it was indicted, HLF was the largest Islamic charity in the United States.
The massive evidence in this trial reveals nearly all major Islamic organizations in the United States are controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood. These include the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim Students Association (MSA), the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and many others. In fact, the Federal Judge overseeing this trial stated the “Government has produced ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA, and NAIT with HLF, the Islamic Association of Palestine (“IAP”), and with Hamas.” Evidence in this trial reveals ISNA was created to be the ‘nucleus’ for the Muslim Brotherhood’s Movement in North America.
Evidence also reveals CAIR was established in 1994 by the Muslim Brotherhood’s U.S. Palestine Committee (Hamas) as the fourth front organization for Hamas in the United States. The leaders of CAIR, Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad, led the IAP (Hamas), were surveilled by the FBI at a 1993 meeting of Hamas leaders in Philadelphia, and their names were on a list of Palestine Section (Hamas) members in the United States. CAIR is Hamas. CAIR’s headquarters office is two blocks from the U.S. Capitol Building.
Additionally, the leadership of the Muslim American Society (MAS), another leading Islamic organization in the U.S., has openly stated they were founded by and are a Muslim Brotherhood entity.
If these facts hold true, and they do, it begs the following questions: Why is the White House, the State Department, and the National Security Council relying on the leadership of ISNA for counsel and input with regards to the American Muslim community? Why is the DHS Secretary working closely with MAS? Why is TSA allowing its security officers to be trained by the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), originally formed out of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Islamic Center of Southern California? Why is Nihad Awad continually allowed on Capitol Hill? Why is the government working with the enemy instead of prosecuting them?