(AP) EU Parliament rejects ACTA anti-piracy treaty
By DON MELVIN
The European Parliament overwhelmingly defeated an international anti-piracy trade agreement Wednesday after concern that it would limit Internet freedom sparked street protests in cities across Europe.
The vote _ 39 in favor, 478 against, with 165 abstentions _ appeared to deal the death blow to the European Union’s participation in a treaty it helped negotiate, though other countries may still participate without the EU.
Supporters had maintained that ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, was needed to standardize the different national laws that protect the rights of those who produce music, movies, pharmaceuticals, fashion goods and other products that often fall victim to piracy and intellectual property theft. EU officials said, too, that protecting European ideas was essential to the economic growth the continent so badly needs.
But opponents feared the treaty would lead to censorship and snooping on the Internet activities of ordinary citizens. Alex Wilks, who directed the anti-ACTA campaign for the advocacy group Avaaz, said the agreement would have permitted private companies to spy on the activities of Internet users and would have allowed users to be disconnected without due process.
Wilks said the agreement did not properly balance the rights of private citizens and those of copyright holders, whom he described as companies, though their ranks also include individual authors and musicians of modest means.
Beyond the EU and 22 of its member countries, eight other countries also signed the agreement _ the U.S., Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea _ though none has yet ratified it. The EU vote will not affect them.
David Martin, a member of the European Parliament from Scotland, pronounced the agreement dead.
But EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht did not sound ready to give up altogether. He said in a statement that he would push ahead with his plan to have Europe’s highest court determine whether the agreement, as currently written, would curtail any fundamental European rights, and would consider his next move in light of that opinion.
But the overwhelming vote Wednesday seemed to indicate that the agreement in its current form has no chance to be approved.
The treaty was unanimously approved by the 27 EU heads of government in December. But EU efforts to ratify it ran into trouble almost immediately. For the EU to become a party to the treaty, all 27 member countries would have to formally approve it.
Protests erupted on the streets of several European cities. A petition by Avaaz in opposition to ACTA garnered 2.8 million signatures and played an important role in influencing the debate.
It began to look increasingly unlikely that all 27 countries would ratify the agreement, so much so that in February the European Commission, the EU’s executive branch, suspended ratification efforts and instead asked the European Court of Justice to render its opinion. The hope clearly was to stall for time and try to resume ratification efforts, armed with a favorable court opinion, in a calmer atmosphere.
As if to underscore the difficulty in getting the agreement ratified by all 27 EU countries _ even had the Parliament given its approval _ France’s governing Socialist Party issued a statement Wednesday crowing about the parliamentary rejection of the treaty.
But copyright holders were, as Martin said, mourning the treaty’s demise. A release on behalf of Europe’s “creative industries,” saying it represented 130 trade federations representing sectors employing over 120 million workers, bemoaned Wednesday’s vote, saying it would damage Europe’s economy.
Alan C. Drewsen, executive director of the International Trademark Association, was particularly critical.
The failure to ratify the treaty is a humiliation for the European Union, which was one of the prime movers in the multi-year effort to negotiate the agreement. EU officials had maintained that ACTA would change nothing in European law, but would be simply an instance of the EU leading by example and exporting its strong copyright protection laws to other countries where safeguards are weaker.
Don Melvin can be reached at http://twitter.com/Don_Melvin