Already on the hook for $65 billion in outstanding school bond debt approved and issued between 2007-2013, Texans voted in more mega-school bond debt statewide in 2014 that will pile nearly $10 billion more onto the statewide property tax payer tab. For public school debt alone, Texans will owe almost $75 billion — before interest.
In the latest go-round of school bonds on the November ballot, the meatiest measure to pass was in Katy Independent School District (ISD), weighing in at $748,118,930, followed by Fort Bend ISD at $484,157,027 and Garland ISD at $455,500,000, the last of which boasted that this was its largest bond package in the district’s history.
According to the Dallas Morning News, the funds were needed for aging facilities and school security:
Other approved big bonds around the state included Lamar ISD, whose voters approved $240.6 million; Birdsville, $163.2 million, Brazosport, $175 million; Bryan ISD $132 million, Corpus Cristi ISD, $100 million; Duncanville ISD, $102.5 million; Del Valle ISD, $134 million; and Pasadena ISD, $175.5. Wylie ISD’s $94.2 million bond measure claimed no tax increase for residents, also according to the article.
Texas caps school property tax at the current $0.50 of $100 taxable value. Keller ISD, which just passed a $169.5 million bond, is one of the many districts that where the $0.50 property tax limit is in place but even so, the total taxpayer liability is over $1.4 billion (including principal & interest), and that translates into a debt payment of over $42,000 per student, which Empower Texans called “nearly three times the state average in a state with the second highest, per capita local debt.”
The Fast Growth School Coalition (FGSC) is a name that comes up repeatedly with school district bonds. In an earlier article, Empower Texans described FGSC dubiously as a “voluntary association of who’ve organized for the explicit purpose of lobbying legislators to raise your property taxes and eliminate existing borrowing limits.”
They have also called FGSC the “unholy alliance of pro-debt special interests, school administrators, and taxpayer-funded lobbyists that stand ready to feed from the ISD bond money trough. Fast Growth’s stated purpose is to substantially increase spending on school facilities and repeal the few debt and tax limits set on ISDs by Texas law.”
Last May’s approved bloated bond measures included $1.2 billion for Cypress-Fairbanks ISD and $775 million for Frisco ISD. The new Frisco property taxpayer debt was heaped onto existing $798 million outstanding debt from a 2006 school bond measure. In 2003, voters had approved a $498 million bond. Along the way seven elementary schools went missing because funds were diverted.
The Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) also took a long, hard look at the Frisco ISD measure, pointing out that on a 30-year bond at 4 percent interest, Frisco school district taxpayers would be on the hook for $556 million worth of interest which factored in with principal costs, would bring the amount owed by Frisco taxpayers for just the 2014 bond to a shocking $1.33 billion, which Breitbart Texas reported.
Meanwhile Frisco ISD already held $2.6 billion in principal and interest debt outstanding. That came out to roughly $56,000 per enrolled student. Today Frisco ISD’s debt level is more than twice that of the surrounding school districts — Lewisville ISD ($1.7 billion), Plano ISD ($1.4 billion), Denton ISD ($1.1 billion), Allen ISD ($806 million) and McKinney ISD ($712 million).
James Quintero, Director of the TPPF’s Center for Local Governance provided Breitbart Texaswith a searing reality check on the staggering actual costs of school bonds for Texans. He broke down the figures statewide with not just principal but with interest on bonds issued as of August 31, 2013.
The “face value” of what people voted on in those bond measures or “principal” may have totaled $65,104,657,568 but once the known interest on the loans were folded in, that layered another $42,971,809,762 onto the debt.
The actual grand total of public school district debt was $108 billion, or $108,076,467,330 to be exact.
Breitbart Texas also spoke to Ross Kecseg, Director of Empower Texans’ Metroplex office. His emphasis is county and local government.
Kecseg said the interest costs are “significant” and underscored that “you’re paying for it with property taxes.”
He explained, “Under the current state law, local governments are not required to disclose the interest costs on the ballot for voters. In other words, interest is a hidden cost taxpayers don’t see until it shows up on their property tax bill.”
Another key factor is the funding mechanism behind school bonds — like Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs). In 2013, Watchdog.org looked at this issue, calling CABs “a product of their time, of $17 trillion national debts, incalculable unfunded national, state and local liabilities and grotesquely underfunded public pensions.”
Unlike the more common current interest bonds, which require that the issuer pay off the principal and interest throughout the term of the bond, interest on capital appreciation bonds compounds and accumulates until maturity. It’s more of a kick the can down the road approach. By the time the bill comes due for a new generation of taxpayers, many of whom had no say in issuing the bonds, the elected officials who did are long out of office or dead, Watchdog.orgalso wrote.
Breitbart Texas highlighted another problem — school CABs do not have regular payments. Interest and principle accrue and compound until maturity when a “balloon payment” is due.
One of the more disconcerting realities is unpredictability. Previously, TPPF pointed out toBreitbart Texas that the success of a CAB is reliant on “the continued explosive growth of Frisco and the surrounding area to meet its obligations. The need to expand must be balanced against the reality that Frisco’s present fiscal situation is tenuous at best.”
This kind of funding formula wilts in times of economic downturn, leaving Frisco ISD “stuck with an enormous amount of debt and facilities it cannot fill and taxpayers are going to have to pick up the tab,” according to TPPF.
In 2011, the Comptroller’s office reported that Texas had the second highest debt in the nation. Public school bonds are not the only debt in Texas — yet accounts for the largest category of debt in the state.
Cities, towns and villages debt ranks second largest to public school debt at $102,966,602,537 for issued principal plus interest.
Among the six bonds to fail in this November election was Bridge City ISD’s $25 million construction proposal that would have provided a new fine arts complex and other unspecified district improvements according to KFDM. The voters of the small community less than 50 miles from Lake Charles, Louisiana said something most other Texas school districts have had a tough time saying, ‘no.’
Disclosure: Michael Quinn Sullivan (Empower Texans) and Chuck DeVore (Texas Public Policy Foundation) are Breitbart Texas Contributors.
Follow Merrill Hope on Twitter @OutOfTheBoxMom