Syrian Migrant Famous For Merkel Selfie Sues Facebook Over Memes

Sean Gallup/Getty

WURZBURG (GERMANY) (AFP) – A German court was due to rule Tuesday on a dispute between Facebook and a Syrian refugee whose post of a selfie with Chancellor Angela Merkel fuelled fake news linking him to terrorism.

Online trolls have repeatedly posted doctored images and wrongful statements that accuse 19-year-old Anas Modamani of having committed Islamist attacks or violent crimes, including setting fire to a homeless man in Berlin last Christmas.

Modamani wants the US social media giant, represented by Facebook Ireland Limited, to stop the spread of such defamatory posts, which have been shared countless times.

He is represented by German lawyer Chan-jo Jun, who has previously launched legal action against Facebook, demanding it stop the spread of racist hate speech and other content illegal under German law.

Modamani and Jun have demanded Facebook actively search out and take down all defamatory posts using the famous selfie images — not just those they have flagged to the company.

Facebook lawyers have argued this would require a “miracle machine” that had not yet been invented, said Jun.

The lawyer has argued that Facebook can automatically identify and take down, for example, pornography and copyrighted music.

The court hearing starts at 1230 GMT in the southern German city of Wurzburg.

WURZBURG, GERMANY - FEBRUARY 06:  Lawyer Chan-Jo Jun (R) and the Syrian refugee Anas Modamani (C) speaks to the media after the court session over Modamani's lawsuit against Facebook at the Landgericht courthouse on February 6, 2017 in Wurzburg, Germany. Modamani is suing Facebook over selfie photos of himself with German Chancellor Angela Merkel that he says were misused by Facebook users accusing him of being a terrorist or guilty of other crimes and that Facebook refused to remove. This is the first time Facebook is being taken to court in Germany.  (Photo by Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images)

Lawyer Chan-Jo Jun (R) and the Syrian refugee Anas Modamani (C) speaks to the media after the court session over Modamani’s lawsuit against Facebook at the Landgericht courthouse on February 6, 2017 in Wurzburg, Germany. (Thomas Lohnes/Getty)

– Right-wing fury –

Modamani arrived in Germany in 2015, along with tens of thousands of other refugees and migrants.

When Merkel visited his Berlin refugee shelter in September that year, he took two selfie images with her in jubilant scenes also captured by news photographers.

Since then, those images have been reposted in different contexts countless times, as right-wing fury has flared online against Merkel’s liberal stance on refugees.

Users have cut and pasted Modamani’s picture into “wanted” posters and on fake news reports, typically alleging that the refugee made famous by the Merkel selfie had turned out to be a terrorist.

Modamani, who is now taking German language courses and working in a fast food restaurant, said the hateful posts had had a damaging impact on his life.

Asked about the case, Facebook has told AFP it is “committed to meeting our obligations under German law in relation to content which is shared by people on our platform”.

The company and other web giants pledged in December 2015 to examine and remove within 24 hours any hateful comments spreading online in Germany, in particular over the mass influx of 890,000 migrants that year.

Jun last year launched legal action against Facebook in Munich, accusing its executives of condoning incitement of hate and violence.

Justice Minister Heiko Maas, who has been negotiating with social network chiefs, has also warned that Facebook and others could be punished if they do not comply with German law.

In January, in the wake of the US presidential election when Facebook was attacked for its role in the spread of fake news, the company announced it would introduce measures to take down “unambiguously wrong reports” being shared on its platform.

It said it would offer a simpler reporting process for users to flag suspected fake news, display warnings next to statements identified as false by independent fact-checking organisations, and cut off advertising revenue to fake news sites.