Soldier Suicides: Are They Really Combat Related? Part 2

In the 1st part I talked about the influences being instilled in our children in school. The suppression of competition, the elimination of standards of right and wrong, and killing the idea of winners and losers. I attempted to explain how I thought these influences were creating an unreal reality that was harming young people when they actually had to enter the real world. In this part I want to touch on how sports and social activities are also contributing to creating this alternate reality that isn’t true to human nature.

Games are one of the first things that children are taught. Every parent knows the game of “Peekaboo”, or I’ve got your nose. They promote the learning experience by motivating the child to interact and respond. Now on the other hand the games that are promoted are more geared to self esteem, reduced aggressiveness to win, and again suppression of competition. The banning of “Dodge Ball”, or “Tag,you’re it” are good examples of creating a more quiescent group of kids. All for the “Good of the children”. More for the ability to control them, and the ability to program them in the reality the creators of these programs wish to convey.

The first sports children are now exposed to are probably more geared for the entertainment of the parents than the kids since a large number of the kids don’t understand what’s going on, or not even paying attention to the game. But, look at “Tee ball” baseball for the really young kids. Everybody gets up to bat, no one strikes out, and runs aren’t scored. Everybody wins, nobody loses. And to top it off, everyone gets a trophy. What are we teaching our kids with this? That as long as you try, you win. Even if you don’t try, just show up you get an award. What’s the purpose? What’s the educational value of learning you win by showing up? I’ll defer back to my prior premise that suppression of the urge to compete, the urge to win, the urge to be superior to others is the real agenda of this program.

Games and sports have historically been the primary way children learn how to interact in society. The experience they gain by interacting and (competing) with their peers, winning and losing as the case may be, gives them the skills needed to cope with the ups and downs that are a natural cycle of life. Pick up games of football or baseball are things of the past for our children. Everything must be scheduled and controlled. The children must be protected from non regimented, uncontrolled playtime. We are told that everything has to have a purpose. What learning value will be gained by time free from control for the children? Is it possible that the children will start competing with each other? To see who is superior to others?

I keep returning to the same point. The suppression of competition, and to control the interactions between individuals. To what purpose is it being done? Is it a progressive agenda in order to create a new society that’s prepped to be controlled by a central authority? Now I sound like some conspiracy theorist. But am I? We’ve just experienced two years of the most progressive government in history. Its attempts to insinuate itself into every facet of our daily lives has been displayed for all to see. The repudiation the progressives received in the just past elections was truly historic. What groups are accepted by all to be progressive? The National Education Association (NEA), The American Federation of Teachers (AFT). Are the results from the elections going to convince these groups that the American people don’t accept their agenda? Of course not. They take the long view. Get the children.

Now I’m back to the actual effects that are being exposed in our young people from a generation of suppression of human nature. But who is it going to effect the most. While discussing this issue with my peers, the question was brought up “How many former gang members that have joined the military are returning from combat and committing suicide?”. I brought up how many soldiers that were brought up with strong religious values are returning from combat and killing themselves. I don’t have an answer to these questions, but I’ll discuss these questions and sum up the total effect I believe is occurring in our soldiers in part three.