Judge Orders Trump: Help ACLU Give Legal aid to Deported Migrants

AP Photo/David J. Phillip

President Donald Trump’s administration must find the deported migrant-parents who separated themselves from their children in the United States, says the Californian judge who is trying to govern the nation’s immigration policies.

“The reality is that for every parent who is not located there will be a permanently orphaned child and that is 100 percent the responsibility of the administration,” U.S. District Judge Dana M. Sabraw said Friday as he announced that he would pick a federal official to help ACLU lawyers meet the deported migrants.

The ACLU’s lawyers want to offer free legal aid to the deported migrants, including advice on how they could join their children in the United States.

The California judge’s condemnation of Trump’s enforcement policies helps progressives blame Trump for “separating families” — even as a growing number of migrants show they are separating and splitting their own families to exploit the immigration loopholes championed by progressives.

The migrants’ decisions to separate children from their own families is a political threat to the left because it undermines their media-magnified campaign to blame Trump for the family separations which are encouraged by the progressives’ migration loopholes.

Trump’s “zero tolerance” enforcement campaign seeks to prosecute all economic migrants — and so deter future migrants who help cut Americans’ wages, crowd into neighborhoods and schools, and eventually vote in Americans’ elections if they can become citizens. In 2017, for example, 400,000 asylum-seekers got work permits to compete for service-worker jobs in the United States, while illegals also birthed roughly 300,000 children in the United States.

Immigration laws require officials to house migrants’ children in facilities run by the Department of Health and Human Services while their detained parents’ legal claims — including requests for asylum — are processed over a period of roughly 40 days. If the migrants are released with their children, very few will return home when their legal appeals are denied — most conceal themselves in the nation’s growing Hispanic population.

But Democrats argue the detention-and-housing practice is an illegitimate effort to deter migrants by forcefully separating parents from children — even though federal law prevents the agencies from keeping children in the parents’ crowded detention centers, except in two smaller family detention centers.

During May and June, officials detained roughly 2,500 migrant parents and sheltered roughly 2,500 of their children at HHS facilities. But in late June, Trump was forced to stop most prosecutions of migrants with children amid a media-magnified pushback by progressives and pro-migrant judges.

Yet progressives have created and still defend the legal loopholes which encourage illegal immigrants to separate their families and bring their children through the border.

For example, many migrant parents come across the border with a single child to exploit the Flores loophole which was created in 2015 by another progressive judge, Judge Dolly Gee. The Flores loophole requires that officials release children from federal detention centers within 20 days. Many migrants used this loophole during President Obama’s years — and it remains open because Judge Gee recently refused to extend the detention period by a few weeks to allow the legal process to be completed while the parents and children are detained.

The New York Times admitted:

Some migrants have admitted they brought their children … because they believed it would cause the authorities to release them from custody sooner.

A July 24 article in the Washington Post, for example, admitted the migrants’ legal tactics after painting the illegal migrants as sympathetic heroes:

 Two by two, they came through the double doors of the shuttered retirement home: mothers tightly clutching their children, fathers holding fast to small hands.

They had been among the more than 2,500 parents stripped of their children and imprisoned after illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border …

With his wife staying behind to safeguard their house, [Jose Luis Villanueva Alvarado had] borrowed $9,000 from relatives to take the girl to the United States, never thinking she could be taken from him …

The fathers had a more modest goal — to stay in the United States long enough to pay off the debts accrued in getting here.

Progressives are also trying to defend the easy asylum rules created by Obama’s deputies, which allowed migrants to file for asylum if they say they had to separate from a spouse because of abuse, or if they claimed a fear of criminals. Attorney General Jeff Sessions ended those easy-asylum rules in July.

Another major cause of the family separations are the “sanctuary cities” where Democrats offer migrants the hope of working in low-wage service-jobs while their children use public schools created for blue-collar Americans. Many fathers split from their families to travel with smugglers on illegal and dangerous treks to the sanctuary cities and the jobs. Without employment, migrants would not be able to repay the huge debts they accept to funding their migration.

Despite the repeated intervention by progressives, judges, and friendly media, Trump’s enforcement agents have deported hundreds of the 2,500 parents, and hundreds more are slated for quick deportation.

But hundreds of the deported parents have chosen to separate themselves from their children by exploiting another loophole which allows their children to live with relatives in the United States. The migrants can leave their children in the United States because the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005 allows the HHS agency to put the children in the custody of people picked by migrants. Throughout 2018, Democrats have refused to endorse any reforms of the TVPRA.

Many of the people who accept the children are illegal immigrants who earlier were let stay in the United States by officials working for President Obama.

Once government officials announced that migrants were using the TVPRA to consciously leave their children in the United States, progressive lawyers claimed the parents were deceived by border officials and would not wish to separate themselves from their children.

That claim has been used by the legal groups to demand government aid in contacting the deported parents. In a statement to Judge Sabraw, the progressive legal firms said:

Not only was it the government’s unconstitutional separation practice that led to this crisis, but the United States Government has far more resources than any group of NGOs (no matter how many NGOs and law firms are willing to try to help). Plaintiffs therefore hope that the Government will take significant and prompt steps to find the parents on their own.

Progressives also want to reward the deported migrants for separating their families by offering free legal-services to move the rest of the family to join the child living in the United States. Lee Gelernt, the ACLU’s lead attorney in the Sabraw court, told NPR:

What I think the judge has understood over the last few weeks is that without us looking for the families, without us attempting to reunify the families, this may not get done as quickly as it needs to. So we have said we have NGOs here in the United States, abroad. We are willing to help if the government would just give us enough information to let us find these [deported] parents.

The legal groups have also won access to migrants who have not yet been deported. In those cases, the pro-migration lawyers advise parents on their right to separate themselves from their children so the children can apply for asylum in the United States. If the children can get asylum, the deported parents may be able to use other legal tactics to reunited with them in the United States.

The status of all 2,500 migrant parents is unclear. NPR said:

According to data released Thursday, 1,535 children have been reunified with their parents in custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Another 444 were discharged to a sponsor other than their parents; reunified with their parents in the custody the Department of Homeland Security earlier in the process; or the children turned 18.

There are still 572 children who remain in the custody of DHS’s Office of Refugee Resettlement because their parents aren’t available or are considered ineligible for reunification if they have a criminal record.

Those NPR numbers hide at least 120 deported parents — and perhaps 400 more — who have chosen to leave their children in the United States, often with close relatives who are living illegally.

Progressives’ encouragement of illegal migration often ensures family separation once migrants for sent home after spending years in the United States.



Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.