On Friday’s “PBS NewsHour,” New York Times columnist David Brooks characterized Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch as “the best any Republican president would have done. So, I thought a very good pick for Donald Trump.”

Brooks stated Gorsuch is a “Clearly qualified, first-rate legal scholar, first-rate judge, first-rate mind, apparently a first-rate person. He’s what any — the best any Republican president would have done. So, I thought a very good pick for Donald Trump.”

He added, “The Democrats have a challenge. They can either behave the way the Republicans did to [Merrick Garland,] which was — would be disgraceful, but that would blow up the system. They have a loyalty either — I think a primary loyalty to the Constitution, and basically to the norms of how we’ve done constitutional — or justice confirmations for the past many decades. And that is, if the president picks someone who is basically qualified, basically a good person, then you confirm that person, even if you don’t agree, because your side lost the election. Now, I understand the Democratic thinking. The Republicans didn’t behave this way. But I guess my belief is that two terrible behaviors don’t make a good behavior.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett