In the past year we`ve learned some amazing things from our liberal friends. From Janeane Garofalo, we learned that if you`re a female member of the Republican Party, you`re mentally ill. We`ve learned from Sandra Bernhard that if you`re Sarah Palin, you`re a “turncoat bitch” who should be raped. And about Miss California, the pointless E News anchor Giuliana Rancic tweets, “I know i’m a journalist, and i should be objective … but she is an ignorant disgrace and she makes me sick to my stomach.”
I got news for you Rancic: you may be the only one who knows you`re a journalist.
So what do all these targets of derision have in common? Well, they aren`t liberal, that`s obvious. And they`re women – I got that too.
But here`s the key: the people attacking them are women.
So why are female liberals often the most spiteful when it comes to female non-libs? I`m no shrink, but I think it has something to do with regret. The fact is, women buying into the hard leftist, feminist ideal can`t stand it when they see women who haven`t – especially ones who happen to be happier than they are.
And they always are.
And the fact is, when chicks like Garofalo are miserable – they start thinking their enemies might be onto something.
And she`s right. Female non-libs don`t buy into Janeane`s notions that acting like a man makes you a better woman. Which is why most men gravitate toward them for the long haul – mainly because the quick roll is out of the question.
Finally, while I disagreed with Miss California`s take on gay marriage, I can still tell she`s a decent person -which is more than I can say for Perez Hilton. Fact is, I don`t give a damn about his sexual orientation. You can paint a turd pink, but it`s still a turd.