I interviewed former Deputy National Security Advisor Elliot Abrams on my show, Secure Freedom Radio, this morning. He observed that Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, the Emir of Qatar, will shortly be visiting the White House. 

Instead of the red carpet treatment, this Persian Gulf potentate should get the sort of rebuff that President Obama has reserved (at least until recently) for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

After all, the Emir is arguably the world’s single most aggressive state sponsor of expansionist Islam and its prime-mover, the Muslim Brotherhood. Of course, it could be argue that Obama is also a contender for that dubious distinction. The following are among the other reasons for dissing, rather than coddling, the Qatari royal: 

Mr. Abrams observed that Qatar is out of step with the rest of the Gulf states, who are increasingly frantic and opposed to the Obama administration’s empowering of the Muslim Brotherhood. He did acknowledge, though, that at least some Saudi princes (notably, Alwaleed bin Talal, who owns the second-largest block of shares of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, is big into Citibank, has given $20 million in gifts to Georgetown and Harvard, etc.) are in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood.

In short, the Emir is the poster-child for the Arab/Muslim double-game that has brought us, among much else, a Muslim Brotherhood-associated mosque in Cambridge that appears to have contributed to fostering the shariah/jihadist fervor of two Chechen brothers. The President should be holding him accountable, not feting him as a key U.S. ally.