We all remember how the media attacked GOP front-runner Mitt Romney’s credibility for days due to what they described as a “misquote” in one of his campaign ads; but up until now, other than obligatory reporting, this same media has refused to call any serious scrutiny or attention to the growing pile of falsehoods discovered in Obama’s reelection documentary, “The Road We’ve Traveled.” 

Something else the media is all but ignoring is that the documentary is narrated by Hollywood A-lister Tom Hanks, who is now embroiled in a racial scandal surrounding a “blackface” incident caught on video tape in 2004. The bigger picture story is not the individual falsehoods; it’s that the media refuses to turn these lies into an actual story. The media is reporting them out of obligation. but in reality. they are covering them up by refusing to connect the dots.

An analysis published Wednesday by FactCheck.org identifies four more factual problems with Obama’s campaign film “The Road We’ve Traveled”:

These four new factual issues are in addition to two others already noted here at Breitbart.com. The first issue, also noted by FactCheck.org, is the inaccurate statement the film makes about the auto bailout. FactCheck’s figures are a bit different than those posted by Raw Story, but the conclusion is the same. Taxpayers have not been fully repaid for the bailout. 

The second issue was identified by the Washington Post earlier this week. Contrary to what the film implies, Obama’s mother did not fight with her insurance company over medical coverage in her last days and, according to her biographer, nothing the insurance company did diminished her chances at recovery.In all, that’s six significant errors in the 17 minute movie. But notice the words used by FactCheck.org. The film “suggests” or “implies.” 

As I pointed out here, the filmmakers have been careful not to lie outright, but are more than willing to make intentionally misleading claims which leave viewers with a false sense of the facts.Obama’s “Road” movie turns out to be the kind of history you might get from a braggart at the local bar after he’s had a few cocktails. Sure it’s entertaining, emotional stuff– but you’d be a fool to believe it was true.