Fighting for her political life, National Rally leader Marine Le Pen appeared before a Paris court this week as she appeals an embezzlement case, which has seen her barred from standing in any election for five years.
At the Court of Appeals on Tuesday, Madame Le Pen began her appeal against last year’s conviction, in which she and other members of the then-National Front party were convicted of allegedly using EU party funds to finance RN operations in France.
Not only was Le Pen convicted of the alleged “embezzlement”, but she was also given a sentence of five years of political ineligibility, which took effect immediately, even during the appeal process, despite defendants usually regaining the presumption of innocence in France during such challenges. Crucially, the five-year ban would prevent Le Pen from running in the presidential election to replace Emmanuel Macron and would likely end her chances of achieving her longtime goal of winning the Élysée Palace.
While the National Rally leader took a combative position during her initial trial last year, claiming that it was blatant lawfare tactics by the establishment to keep her from taking power, she struck a more conciliatory tone this week in Paris.
“I have no feeling that I have committed a crime,” she told the court, according to Le Figaro. Le Pen also questioned why the European Parliament “failed to play its role in raising the alarm” about any potential wrongdoings. She argued that none of her colleagues would want to risk being on the end of “political justice” and therefore if any breaches were made, it would have been by mistake rather than malice.
It is an open secret in Brussels that politicians and their parties have long used EU funds — intended to pay for EU parliamentary staff — to subsidise political activities in their home countries, despite the domestic and international political operations supposedly being separate under EU law and the funds not being legally fungible.
Indeed, a report from the Follow the Money website in 2023 found that between 2019 and 2022, one in five Members of European Parliament (MEPs) had broken the same rules Le Pen and her fellow party members were accused of breaking, yet just one out of 139 had even faced an investigation over the matter. Critics say the funding issue is basically ignored unless the politicians threaten the European Union itself, when suddenly investigations begin.
However, it is unclear if the French appeals court will consider such disparities in its ruling. While the hearings will take place this week, a final judgment is not expected from the court until sometime in the Summer, which would theoretically give Le Pen enough time to mount a campaign for the 2027 presidential race.
Yet, should her appeal fail, it would have major implications for the presidential race and the course of French history. Indeed, if she is prohibited from standing, it would mark the first time since 1981 that neither she nor her father, Jean Marie Le Pen, was on the ballot in a presidential election.
The three-time presidential candidate has said that if banned, she will throw her weight behind her 30-year-old deputy, Jordan Bardella, who would become the youngest president in French history if elected. Currently, either Le Pen or Bardella is projected to win over the likely challengers from the liberal centre and the far left.
A poll published on Sunday by the Verian Institute for Le Monde suggested that the National Rally, which has long been demonised as the “far-right” of French politics, despite having broadly left-wing views on economics and state intervention, is increasingly seen by the public as within the mainstream.
According to the survey, 42 per cent of respondents said that they shared some of the ideas of the National Rally, an increase of 13 points over just two years ago. Meanwhile, despite the boogeyman characterisations, 44 per cent said they did not believe the party represented a “danger” if elected, compared to 47 per cent who did in 2022.