This morning’s key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com

Updating Global Conflict Risk Assessment for China threat

Starting in 2004, I began posting a “Global Conflict Risk” graphic onthe Home Page of my website. It’s purpose was to encapsulate the current state of the world,and the likelihood of world conflict. The intention was that thegraphic would be updated only rarely, as world events require. Thelast update was in February, 2011, as follows:


Conflict Risk Graphic – February 12, 2011

My thinking in 2004 was that there were six regions of the world thathad the potential for triggering a world war. Thus, there wereimportant regional wars going on in Sri Lanka, Darfur, Congo, andother places, but these wars were unlikely to spiral into major wars.

On the other hand, I believed that a war in any of the six regionsshown in the graphic was likely to spiral into a larger regionalconflict, and then possibly to world war. In addition, I felt that amajor financial crisis or world flu outbreak would trigger a broadwar. Thus, the graphic was indicating my personal assessment of theprobability (green=low, yellow=medium, high=red) of a crisis in eachof these eight categories during the next 6-12 months, since such acrisis was thought likely to trigger a wider war.

My thinking in 2005 has turned out to be wrong. There have beenmultiple wars in the six regions, and they have not spiraled intowider wars. (However, we have not yet had a major financial crisisnor a major flu outbreak.)

One of the reasons that my reasoning turned out to be wrong was that Iassumed that one of these regional wars would cause other countries tobe pulled into the war, causing an uncontrolled spiral. As it turnsout, the opposite happened: Other countries rushed in to force aresolution to the war as quickly as possible, so that it wouldn’tspiral out of control. In most cases, this “resolution” did nothingto solve the underlying problems, but only “kicked the can down theroad” in the familiar way that does the minimum possible to fix thecurrent crisis, leaving the crisis to recur a few weeks or monthslater.

I’m now updating the Global Conflict Risk graphic to reflect this newthinking. The new graphic is as follows:


Conflict Risk Graphic – January 1, 2013

I’m keeping the categories the same, but now when I assign aprobability of conflict in a region, I’m taking into account myassessment of whether a war in that region is likely to pull in othercountries as combatants or as pacifiers.

The Most Dangerous Regions of the World

Let’s go through each of the eight categories, and the probability ofa regional war that will spiral into a world war:

Forecast for 2013: Financial crisis and China Threat

In 2004, I identified the “Six most dangerous regions in world”, and I did a littlecomputation to estimate the probability of a regional war that mightspiral into world war, and I came up with a probability of 22% eachyear. I don’t think that computation was particularly valid, but itillustrates the point that in 2004 I expected the worst to be at leasta few years in the future.

This year, there are strong signals that the financial crisis and theChina threat are imminent. China has almost said as much, asdescribed above.

To pull things together for the 2013 outlook, let’s take a look at thefollowing updated graph for the historic S&P 500 Price/Earnings Ratio(also called “stock valuations”):


S&P 500 Price/Earnings Ratio (P/E1) Index, 1871-present

It’s worth pointing out that you see all kinds of historical graphs onCNBC and the other financial media, but you never see a historicalgraph of the P/E ratio, because anyone who looks at it can see justhow dysfunctional the financial system really is. In fact, as we’verepeatedly documented, naming names, so-called “experts” lie openlyabout stock valuations. (See, for example, “14-Apr-12 World View — Wharton School’s Jeremy Siegel is lying about stock valuations” from earlier this year.) Intoday’s world, respectable people are gangsters, and gangsters aretreated as respectable people.

As you can see from the above graph, the P/E ratio has returned to the5-7 level every 31-32 years or so, most recently in 1980. Sincereaching a peak value of 123.8 in mid-2009, the ratio has been fallingfairly steadily. If you look at the historical flow of the abovegraph, you can see that the P/E ratio is about to fall sharply, againto the 5-7 level, which would put the Dow at about 3,000.

The stock market has just barely been holding on, thanks to hugeamounts of quantitative easing and fiscal stimulus. The Fed and theEuropean Central Bank (ECB) have each injected over a trillion dollarsinto the banking system in the last year. That liquidity has donenothing for the economy in general, but it’s kept the stock marketafloat.

Here’s how analyst John P. Hussman describes the situation:

“Since 2009, both the stock market and the broadU.S. economy have been dependent on perpetual support from massivefederal deficits and unprecedented money creation. Meanwhile, WallStreet is content to ignore the extent of this support, and lookson every movement of the economy as a sign of intrinsic health -which is a lot like admiring the graceful flight of a dead parrotswinging by a string from the ceiling fan.”

With China threatening war, and with the global financial systemcompletely dysfunctional, it’s possible that the “fiscal cliff” willbe the least of America’s problems in 2013.

KEYS:
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail