New York Times: Most Thought Breitbart Did 'Ill' For US

New York Times: Most Thought Breitbart Did 'Ill' For US

As Bill Kristol points out at the Weekly Standard, the New York Times ran a posthumous profile of Andrew Breitbart today – and writer David Carr didn’t pull his punches about how he felt about Andrew:

            For good or ill (and most would say ill), no one did it like Mr. Breitbart.

Kristol points out:

“Most would say ill?” Really? I know of no empirical evidence that backs up this statement. If anything, my experience has been the opposite–almost all conservatives would say Andrew was a force for good, and even some liberals would deny he was a force for ill.

Kristol suspects that Carr didn’t write this – his editors did, as a snarky aside attempting to cast aspersions on Andrew’s reputation. Typical odious “reporting” from the Grey Lady.

Comment count on this article reflects comments made on and Facebook. Visit Breitbart's Facebook Page.