Nikki Haley: Trump’s Peace Plan ‘Different’ from All Previous Plans

US ambassador to UN calls for support for new Mideast peace plan

TEL AVIV – The soon-to-be-unveiled Middle East peace plan by the Trump administration will “be different from all previous ones,” outgoing U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said on Tuesday

Haley called on Palestinians and Israelis to back the plan, which she said was more “thoughtful” and “embraces the reality that things can be done today that were previously unthinkable.”

“Unlike previous attempts at addressing this conflict, this plan is not just a few pages, containing unspecific and unimaginative guidelines,” Haley said in her final appearance at a regular Security Council session. “It is much longer. It contains much more thoughtful detail. It brings new elements to the discussion, taking advantage of the new world of technology that we live in. It recognizes the realities on the ground in the Middle East have changed — and changed in very powerful and important ways.”

“The critical question is whether the response will be any different. There are things in the plan that every party will like, and there are things in the plan that every party will not like,” said Haley, adding that the Palestinians had the most to gain from a peace deal.

“Israel is a thriving, strong, prosperous country,” she said. “It has always wanted peace with its neighbors. It has clearly demonstrated its willingness to make big sacrifices for peace, including giving up large areas of land. But Israel will not make a peace agreement at just any price, and it shouldn’t. No UN resolutions, antisemitic boycotts, or terrorist threats will ever change that. Throughout its existence, and even today, Israel has been surrounded by threats to its security. It would be foolish for it to make a deal that weakened its security. And yet, even in the face of constant threats, Israel has become one of the leading nations in the world. Israel wants a peace agreement, but it doesn’t need one.”

“And then there are the Palestinian people,” she continued. “Like the Israelis, they are a deservedly proud people. They too do not need to accept a peace agreement at any price. But the condition of the Palestinian people is very different. Economic opportunity, health care, even electricity are all scarce in the Palestinian territories. Terrorists rule much of the territory, undermining the safety of all civilians. The Palestinian people are suffering terribly while their leadership clings to 50-year-old demands that have only become less and less realistic. What awaits the Palestinian people with a peace agreement are the prospects of a massive improvement in the quality of their lives and far greater control over their political future.”

“It is time we faced a hard truth — both sides would benefit greatly from a peace agreement, but the Palestinians would benefit more, and the Israelis would risk more,” Haley said.

Haley, who is set to be replaced by State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert, concluded by saying: “The world must know that America will remain steadfast in our support of Israel, its people, and its security. That is an unshakable bond between our two peoples. And it is that bond — more than anything else — that makes peace possible.”

The European Union responded by emphasizing a “strong continued commitment to the internationally agreed parameters” — to include a two-state solution along the 1967 lines and Jerusalem to serve as a capital for both.

“Any peace plan that fails to recognize these internationally agreed parameters would risk being condemned to failure,” an EU statement read.


Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.