Several GOP senators are refusing to commit to subpoena John Bolton, following the former national security advisor’s letter detailing his willingness to comply in the event he is called to the Senate impeachment trial.
Bolton said in a statement on Monday he will testify if the Senate issues a subpoena for his testimony.
“Accordingly, since my testimony is once again at issue, I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could, based on careful consideration and study,” Bolton said in a statement.
“I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify,” he continued.
The statement served as a boost for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-CA), who has been vying for at least four Republicans to cross over, giving Democrats a simple majority to pass an organizing resolution that satisfies their immediate demands for witnesses.
“A simple majority is all it takes to ensure that the Senate issues a subpoena for these witness if only four Republicans decide that Mr. Bolton and the three other witnesses ought to be heard, they will be heard because every Democrat will vote to hear them,” Schumer said on the Senate floor, accusing GOP senators who oppose his testimony of engaging in a “cover-up.”
He said:
Given Mister Bolton’s lawyers have stated has new and relevant information to share, if any Senate Republican opposes issuing subpoenas to the four witnesses and documents we’ve requested, they would make it absolutely clear they are participating in cover-up.
Several GOP senators are skeptical, refusing to commit to subpoena Bolton until parameters of the trial are set. Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), for instance, believe the call for Bolton to testify is premature and have called for the Senate to follow the precedent of the Clinton impeachment trial, holding off on considering additional witnesses until after opening arguments.
“I don’t think there is any decision on Bolton because we don’t have articles,” Murkowski told reporters.
“I think it’s difficult to decide in isolation before we have heard the opening statements. … There are a number of witnesses that may well be appropriate for Stage 3, of which he would certainly be one,” Collins said, according to Axios.
“I would like to be able to hear from John Bolton. What the process is to make that happen, I don’t have an answer for you,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) said of the demands for Bolton to testify.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), however, dismissed the need for Bolton to testify altogether, citing the inquiry in the House.
“I think in my view our inquiry should be based on the testimony that they took, we are acting on articles of impeachment. We should be constrained by the information that those articles are based on,” he stated:
Asked why he doesn’t want to hear additional information from Bolton, Rubio added: “That’s what the House should have taken into account when they did the articles over there. So we’ll be voting on the articles they’ll be sending us. And that’s what we should be acting on.”
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 6, 2020
“Worth repeating. The testimony & evidence considered in a Senate impeachment trial should be the same testimony & evidence the House relied upon when they passed the Articles of Impeachment,” Rubio wrote in a tweet.
“Our job is to vote on what the House passed,not to conduct an open ended inquiry,” he added:
Worth repeating.
The testimony & evidence considered in a Senate impeachment trial should be the same testimony & evidence the House relied upon when they passed the Articles of Impeachment.
Our job is to vote on what the House passed,not to conduct an open ended inquiry.
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) January 6, 2020
Others, such as Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO), suggested that there is no sense to discuss hearing from Bolton given Pelosi’s refusal to transmit the articles of impeachment.
“Is Nancy going to send the articles over? She doesn’t seem to care?” Gardner said. “You guys want to have a trial by Twitter but until she has the articles sent over there is no trial.”
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has signaled that he is open to impeachment witnesses but has been adamant that the Senate follow the precedent of the Clinton impeachment trial.
“The Senate’s unanimous bipartisan precedent from 1999 left witnesses and other mid-trial questions to the middle of the trial,” McConnell said on Monday.
“House Democrats may have scrapped their own precedents to hurt President Trump but they do not call the shots in the Senate,” he added.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Monday introduced a resolution to dismiss the impeachment trial against the president.
“Now she wants to prevent a Senate trial, perhaps indefinitely,” Hawley said of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). “But the Constitution gives the Senate sole power to adjudicate articles of impeachment, not the House.”
“If Speaker Pelosi is afraid to try her case, the articles should be dismissed for failure to prosecute and Congress should get back to doing the people’s business,” he added.
COMMENTS
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.