When Hollywood Leftists cannibalize one another as if they were a bunch of Troglodytes forced into an out of control Kubrick film it sends a spool-of-drool to my mouth like a Pavlovian animal. Over the weekend Sigourney Weaver served up this little dish about her showbiz sister Kathryn Bigelow while in Brazil promoting Pocahontas. I mean Avatar. She reportedly said…
“Jim didn’t have breasts, and I think that was the reason,” she told told Folha Online, a Brazilian news site. “He should have taken home that Oscar.”
That’s delicious Sigourney, may I have seconds? She went on to say, “In the past, Avatar would have won because they [Oscar voters] loved to hand out awards to big productions, like Ben-Hur. Today it’s fashionable to give the Oscar to a small movie that nobody saw.”
Kathryn Bigelow deserved to be honored not only for making a film that had more balls than the blue ones James Cameron hung out in 3-D, but she should also be held up to young women throughout the world over as an example of what’s possible when you’re willing to work for it. I can probably guess what Kathryn’s politics are, but I don’t care. When she accepted her award she did the right thing; she thanked the men and woman serving and dying for this country.
I’d like to buy that woman a drink.
I think I know why Sigourney Weaver chose to simply label Kathryn Bigelow as “just a set of tits” and not praise her accomplishment in a male-dominated and misogynistic industry. It can be found by simply Googling, HAS SIGOURNEY WEAVER EVER WON AN OSCAR?
Hollywood liberals like Weaver see the world through a prism of race, sex and social justice, and there are only two thing that get them to eat their own: money and trophies. The clock is ticking on Sigourney Weaver for an Oscar win. She’s not getting any younger, and it seems only when she gets to toss her own golden bone to the air in Kubrickian glee, will she be able to stand abreast with her Oscar sister.