Army Iraq War Study: ‘An Emboldened and Expansionist Iran Appears to Be the Only Victor’

In this June 20, 2014 file photo, a fighter of the Mahdi Army, formed by Muqtada al-Sadr, stands guards in front of a Shiite mosque after Friday prayers, in the northern oil rich province of Kirkuk, Iraq. Al-Sadr, notorious for his followers’ deadly attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq and …
AP Photo/Hussein Mall

A long-awaited study of the 2003 war in Iraq released this week concluded that Iran surfaced as “the only victor” of the conflict while Iraq ended up “at best emasculated” and at worst a proxy of the Islamic Republic.

Titled “The U.S. Army in the Iraq War” and commissioned in 2013 by retired Gen. Raymond Odierno when he was the service’s chief, the two-volume study concluded:

In terms of geostrategic consequences, the war produced profound consequences. At the time of this project’s completion in 2018, an emboldened and expansionist Iran appears to be the only victor. Iraq, the traditional regional counterbalance for Iran, is at best emasculated, and at worst has key elements of its government acting as proxies for Iranian interests. With Iraq no longer a threat, Iran’s destabilizing influence has quickly spread to Yemen, Bahrain, and Syria, as well as other locations.

The study, released Thursday, highlighted a plethora of failures during the eight-year conflict (2003 to 2011), including the lack of awareness among the military of the sectarian, social, and political dynamic gripping Iraq at the time that would eventually give birth to the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL).

Moreover, the U.S. never developed an effective strategy to deal with Iran and Syria as they gave sanctuary and support to both Shiite and Sunni terrorists, the report concluded. Both Iran and Syria harbored and provided support to the Sunni and Shiite terrorists, effectively contributing to the killing and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqis and hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of U.S.-led coalition troops.

The study found:

Although the United States should always be wary of expanding a conflict to other nations, U.S. leaders should consider the option of escalation — including with military power — when neighboring states become de facto combatants. In Iraq, the U.S. inability to find an effective response to Syrian and Iranian proxies made accomplishing our political and military objectives almost impossible.

The U.S.-led coalition had political value but was “largely unsuccessful” because the allies failed to deploy enough troops and limited the scope of their activities, the Army determined.

One Iranian proxy alone carried out 6,000 attacks on U.S. troops between 2006 and 2011, the Institute for the Study of War found.

U.S. Army officers reported Thursday:

The Iranian regime produced sophisticated and lethal technology for their Iraqi proxies to use against U.S. troops, and U.S. forces had difficulty keeping up with the evolution of Iranian weapons such as explosively formed penetrators and improvised rocket-assisted munitions (IRAMs). These weapons killed and wounded scores of U.S. troops, but the United States responded to them only at the tactical and operational levels, not the strategic.

Iran also supplied its Shiite proxies still wreaking havoc to this day with explosively formed penetrators (EFPs), a form of improvised explosive device (IED) or roadside bomb, which caused mounting American casualties.

Other failures the study highlights include a lack of troops, which prevented commanders from defeating the insurgency and Iran-backed Shiite militias; not enough training for the U.S. National Guard, which made it difficult to fight jihadis; the failure to develop an effective Iraqi force independent from U.S. support; an ineffective detainee policy that failed to treat captured insurgents or militiamen as prisoners of war, which allowed them to return to the battlefield; and relying on democracy to bring stability.

In November 2018, the Pentagon’s inspector general deemed Iranian-backed militias, including some who fought against American troops during the 2003 Iraq war, a menace for the 5,000 U.S. troops who remained in Iraq. Despite the threat, it appeared the Pentagon still did not develop a strategy for fighting the Iran-allied Shiite militias in Iraq.

American troops had invaded Iraq in response to the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

“The human and material cost of the conflict was staggering. Nearly 4,500 American military personnel lost their lives in the fighting, and another 32,000 were wounded― many of them grievously,” the study acknowledged. “More than 300 soldiers from other coalition nations also perished. Estimates on Iraqi casualties vary wildly, ranging from roughly 200,000 killed to more than a million.”

The study estimated that the monetary cost of the war has been anywhere “over 800 billion to nearly 2 trillion dollars.”


Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.