Obama's War of Choice in Libya Angers All the Right People by Greg Gutfeld 22 Mar 2011 post a comment Share This: So by bombing Libya, Obama succeeds in pissing off his key supporters: the anti-war left. Which shows you how naive the anti-war left is. if you actually believe a president will not go to war, because HE PROMISED YOU! - then you're like every girl on Rock of Love. Hopelessly disappointed. And high as a kite. People who campaign on peace, often wage war in office. They'll just drag their feet a little longer, which is what Obama did. But I support the President because I try to be consistent on military matters. And to be fair, so are some on the anti-war left. Compare the currently angry Michael Moore to those lefties who, after reaming Bush for 8 years, are now oddly silent on Obama's war. That's kinda weird. Anyway, after Obama's behavior toward Egypt, he had little choice. Avoiding Kaddafi, after kicking a meeker Mubarak out the door - would smack of weakness. But here's why bombing Libya may be good: for forty years we've had to deal with Gadaffi's vile mug. It may not be a "vital interest" to "get" him - but it's justice. Think of all the crap he's done to innocent people, including Americans. Lastly, the action angers the right people. I dislike the anti-war movement because we, as humans, are all anti-war. It creates a false opposition: that the rest of us are PRO-WAR. But we're not. I'm pro military. It's the high speed rail with actual, awesome purpose. More important, if the anti-war movement succeeds, evil all over would increase, because without threat of punishment, the brutal will blossom. And inevitably, America falls. Which, to the left, is better than putting up a fight. And if you disagree with me, you're worse than Hitler! Tonight: Tucker Carlson! John Devore! Jedidiah Bila!