Turkey’s Parliament Debates Greater Powers for Erdogan

Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan chairs the annual meeting of the Supreme Military Council in Ankara November 30, 2010. The council is to decide the fate of three generals who have recently been suspended over their suspected ties with a coup plot, with the government determined to keep the officers …

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkey’s Parliament on Monday kicked off debate on proposed constitutional amendments that would hand Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s largely ceremonial presidency sweeping executive powers and Erdogan himself the possibility to serve two more five-year terms.

Erdogan, who has dominated Turkish politics for 14 years, has long pushed for imbuing the presidency with greater political powers, arguing that strong leadership would help Turkey grow.

The main opposition party fears that if approved, the reforms would concentrate too much power in Erdogan’s hands, turn the country into a de facto dictatorship and move Turkey away from democracy and its anchor in the West.

“They are trying to turn the democratic parliamentary regime into a totalitarian regime,” said main opposition Republican Peoples’ Party, or CHP, leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu.

Debate on the set of amendments is expected to last two weeks. The reforms must clear two rounds of balloting in parliament, known as the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, attaining at least 330 of the 550 votes.

If approved by lawmakers, the government will submit the package to a voter referendum for final approval — possibly in the spring.

On Monday, police used pepper spray to disperse a group of legislators, lawyers and other protesters who tried to gather near an entrance to the parliament building to oppose the proposed constitutional changes.

Some roads leading to parliament were blocked in an apparent bid to prevent demonstrations.

The ruling party, founded by Erdogan, is 14 votes short of the required 330, but has secured the backing of the country’s nationalist party.

The changes would scrap the office of the prime minister and make the president the head of the executive branch, as well as allow him to appoint the government, dissolve Parliament, propose budgets, and declare states of emergency. They would also allow Erdogan to serve another two terms, ending in 2029.

Currently, the prime minister leads the executive branch, while the president is mainly a figurehead with limited powers.

Other proposed amendments would increase the number of seats in the 550-member Parliament to 600, reduce the minimum eligibility age for legislators from 25 to 18, and set parliamentary and presidential elections on the same day.

The debate comes at a difficult time for Turkey, which has been rocked by a wave of bombings, renewed conflict with Kurdish rebels in the southeast, a military offensive in Syria, and a failed coup attempt.

The botched July 15 coup set the stage for a sweeping purge of state institutions that has alarmed rights groups and Western governments.

The government has argued a strong presidential system would reduce instability.

“They ask, why are you keeping yourselves occupied with constitutional amendments (when) there is terrorism?” Prime Minister Binali Yildirim said last week. “Look, it’s today that we have the greatest need for a constitutional reform.”

Critics say the changes would allow Erdogan to rule with limited checks and balances. Erdogan is already accused of overstepping the limits of presidential powers as set by the constitution, ruling behind the scenes and ignoring laws that require him to be neutral.

Erdogan argues that the fact that he was elected by the people directly — and not through parliament as previous presidents were — gives him greater authority.

Former Republican Peoples’ Party leader Deniz Baykal said the proposals were being rushed through, while Turkey remains under post-coup emergency rule and at a time when the country is highly polarized.

“A proposal that will destroy our century-old tradition and will replace the will of the people with the hegemony of a single person stands before us,” Baykal said. “We are holding a historic session. I am not here to engage in daily politics. I am here to safeguard Turkey.”

A committee approved the draft amendments following 10 days of tense debate that at times resulted in altercations between the ruling party and main opposition party members. Debate in the General Assembly is expected to be equally tense.

The deliberations started without the two co-leaders and nine other legislators from Turkey’s pro-Kurdish party, who have been jailed on alleged charges of links to Kurdish rebels.

“As our right to express our opinions and our right to vote for the constitutional changes have been usurped, these deliberations and voting are contentious, illegitimate, and their lawfulness questionable,” pro-Kurdish party co-chairman Selahattin Demirtas, said in a letter to parliament sent from prison.


Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.