If ‘Bump Stock’ Was the Problem in Las Vegas, Why Did Barack Obama Approve It?
One can argue that bump stocks should be regulated in any case. But Obama’s miss is a reminder that people with evil intentions will always be one step ahead of the law.

One can argue that bump stocks should be regulated in any case. But Obama’s miss is a reminder that people with evil intentions will always be one step ahead of the law.

While bump stocks are taking criticism, it is interesting to note that the devices were approved for sale in 2010 by Barack Obama’s ATF.

Two days after the Vegas attack, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said a hearing on banning bump-stock devices is “worthwhile.”

In an October 4 report, CBS News claims that Las Vegas attacker Stephen Paddock had AR-15s that fired “automatic rounds.”

Rep. Bill Flores (R-TX) is taking a stand for gun control by calling for a ban on bump stocks following Las Vegas attack.

Breitbart News thought it wise to describe exactly what the devices are, as well as what they do (and do not do).

In the wake of terrible events like the shooting at the Route 91 Harvest festival outside the Mandalay Bay, it is tempting, and understandable, to demand that our elected leaders “do something.” But what, in fact, would have prevented Stephen Paddock from committing mass murder?
