New Spitzer Hypocrisy In AIG Case by Roger Stone 25 Dec 2009 post a comment Share This: Former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer took to the New York Times OP-ED page to call for the full release of a AIG corporate e-mails to determine how and why the company crashed. This is the same Eliot Spitzer who stonewalled attempts by the New York State Senate Committee on Investigations and the New York Commission on Ethics to obtain the E-Mails of Spitzer and his top aides surrounding the abuse of power in his using the New York State Police to spy on his political opponents. Likewise, Spitzer attempted to prevent his top aides from testifying. This man's hypocrisy knows no bounds. The idea of former New York Governor and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer criticizing the AIG bailout is ridiculous; Spitzer is responsible for the economic condition of the company for which they needed a bailout. In fact, Spitzer's crackdown on Wall Street caused the firms to increase leverage because he took away the ability for them to make money in research and underwriting, and they looked for other ways to make money; like securitizing subprime mortgages. In fact, if Spitzer hadn't removed Maurice "Hank" Greenberg from AIG, the company would never have crashed. Greenberg was a much more conservative investor, and had tighter risk management rules that were suspended by the company only after Spitzer drove Greenberg out over charges that proved bogus in the courts. The billion dollar investment in credit default swaps which were not hedged brought the company and the economy down. This insurance was written only after Greenberg was forced out and never would have been written under Greenberg's risk management rules. Thus, Eliot Spitzer is partially responsible for the current economic crisis, not some Boy Scout crying an early warning. This is as typical of his reign as Attorney General, where he blackmailed companies by press release; threatening to destroy your company's value unless you pled to infractions you hadn't actually committed. Most saw the futility of winning in court after Spitzer had destroyed their company, so they settled. When cases actually went to trial most were dismissed or those Spitzer apprehended were acquitted. Spitzer's assault on the New York Stock Exchange's Ken Grasso, Ken Langone and Greenberg, while not also pursuing NYSE board member Carl McCall for fear of offending key African American political leaders, stands out as the kind of perverted justice Spitzer pursued. Spitzer made baseless charges against Greenberg, drove him from the company, and set the stage for AIG's collapse. Above all, while Spitzer was chasing-but not catching-guys on Wall Street, the Madoff scandal, where Spitzer does have jurisdiction, went on under his nose. Likewise, the New York State Pension scandal where associates of Spitzer's fellow Democrat Alan Hevesi's, raked off millions. Spitzer's avoidance of prosecution for money laundering and violation of the Mann Act (that is, transporting a woman across state lines for the purposes of prostitution (which a New York State Supreme Court Justice was convicted and jailed for in 2009), while the Madam who booked him prostitutes, spent four months on Rikers Island, is nothing but sexist. Why should this bald , pasty faced meglomaniac walk, while everyone else in the case did time?