Senator Chambliss Demands More Action from Attorney General on SWATtings

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) today sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder regarding the recent incidents of SWAT-tings, and has demanded a more thorough response to the earlier letter he sent on June 6, 2012.  In Wednesday’s letter, Senator Chambliss emphasized the dangers that SWAT-ting presents, and warned “When innocent people are handcuffed, children witness their parents treated as criminals, helicopters overhead awaken the neighbors and the victim realizes that one wrong move by him or his family could lead to irreversible catastrophe, there is overwhelming cause for concern.” Since Chambliss' initial letter was sent to Holder, another SWATting has occurred.

Chambliss also noted his concern that the recent SWAT-tings may be used as a tool for silencing political speech.

On June 11, 2012, more than 85 members of Congress sent a similar letter to Holder, demanding that the Department of Justice investigate the recent incidents of SWAT-tings.

Chambliss called upon Holder to elaborate on whether any federal laws have been violated and on whether local criminal authorities are adequately equipped to investigate such incidents.  The senator has demanded a response from Holder’s office by July 27, 2012.

The letter appears below in full.  You can also read the press release and letter here at the Senator's website.

 

July 11, 2012

Dear Attorney General Holder:

As you recall, I wrote to you on June 6, 2012, over the trend of SWAT-ting cases that apparently target political commentators. Since then, at least one additional incident has been reported.


On a June 6 phone call, you personally assured me that you would give special attention to my inquiry on this matter. On June 29, my office received a cursory, boilerplate response from the acting assistant attorney general in the office of legislative affairs that did not address the substance of the issue at hand. With that in mind, I am asking for a more substantive response to my initial inquiry and for illumination on the following points:


The department letter states the Federal Bureau of investigation and its law enforcement partners are working the telecommunications industry to address this issue. A SWAT-ting story from February 2008 on the FBI's public website also states that," law enforcement agencies at all levels are currently working with telecommunications providers around the country to help them address SWAT-ting activity." After four years, I believe that Congress needs additional information to aid in our understanding of this cooperation.


The department letter also mentions that the FBI has investigated some instances of SWAT-ting directly, but that the majority of cases have been investigated at the local level. As my initial letter stated, I have no doubt that local law enforcement is reviewing each incident, but I ask that you," look into these cases as well to determine if any federal laws have been violated." Your response was notably silent on whether this has happened. Why are the majority of cases investigated at the local level if there is a strong possibility that federal laws have been violated?


Finally, the department letter indicates a willingness to work with Congress to determine whether existing criminal authorities are adequate to address this problem. In advance of any discussion regarding sufficiency of existing criminal statutes, it would seem necessary for Congress to have a better understanding of how the department has attempted to apply those existing provisions, a point on which your letter was also silent. In order to better inform us, please provide examples of where the department believes existing criminal authorities, when applied to these cases, are potentially inadequate.


I remain extremely concerned about the danger SWAT-ting presents, and am worried about its use as a tool for silencing political speech. You and your department should be equally worried about these attempts at intimidation.


To date, no one has been harmed during these dangerous acts, but when an unsuspecting family is awakened in the middle of the night by police with guns drawn rushing into their bedrooms, all of the elements are in place for a tragedy. When innocent people are handcuffed, children witness their parents treated as criminals, helicopters overhead awaken the neighbors and the victim realizes that one wrong move by him or his family could lead to irreversible catastrophe, there is overwhelming cause for concern. An issue of such gravity is deserving of more than a cursory response from your department.


I hope you will take this opportunity to more thoroughly address my concerns. Delay in addressing this issue could prove disastrous. Again, I appreciate your attention to this matter, and look forward to your response by July 27, 2012. Please feel free to contact my office with any questions or comments you may have.


Very truly yours,

Saxby Chambliss

 

 


advertisement

Breitbart Video Picks

advertisement

advertisement

Fox News National

advertisement

advertisement

Send A Tip

From Our Partners