Trump Judicial Nominee Didn’t Disclose Writings on Alabama Sports Fan Site, Somehow This Matters

AP Brynn Anderson
AP Photo/Brynn Anderson

Judicial nominees have landed in hot water over failing to disclose all sorts of things. Some have declined to disclose political contributions, others have neglected to mention they’ve employed illegal aliens.

However, the thing that one of President Trump’s judicial nominees failed to disclose, well, this is a new one.

Brett Talley, one of President Trump’s federal court nominees, has drawn some unwanted attention over failing to disclose years of posts he wrote on a University of Alabama fan site.

According to BuzzFeed:

The messages on were posted by the user “BamainBoston.” In a Dec. 8, 2014, post, the user identified himself as Brett Talley, linking to a Washington Post article about Talley under the subject line “Washington Post Did A Feature On Me.”

Talley has been nominated for a seat on the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, and is already facing criticism this week for a disclosure-related issue: The New York Times reported on Monday that Talley failed to include in his Senate questionnaire that he is married to a lawyer in the White House counsel’s office, Ann Donaldson. The questionnaire asks nominees to disclose family members who are “likely to present potential conflicts of interest.”

While Talley did disclose writings of his that he posted on other sites; such as posts on “Government in Exile,” and some writings on his personal website about horror writing. Talley did not disclose any of his writings on However, there’s some dispute over whether he actually needed to disclose those writings.

White House spokesperson Hogan Gidley sent an email to BuzzFeed News, arguing that message board posts need not be disclosed to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“The Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire asks for published writings and public statements — not everything that’s ever been typed on a keyboard. Alabama football fans’ internet message board conversations are not deemed ‘published writings’, ‘public statements’, or ‘published material;’ nor are they deemed the equivalent of ‘books’, ‘articles’, or ‘reports.'”

Gidley makes a strong point with this argument. How, in the 21st Century, can anyone be expected to disclose anything they’ve ever typed on a keyboard? Maybe a case can be made that Talley should have at least informed the committee of his username, and the fact that he posted on a fan site. However, expecting Talley to collect and present thousands of comments about 5-star recruits and whether Nick Saban has surpassed Bear Bryant, is a bit much.

If the committee wants everything anyone has ever typed on a keyboard, then they need to explicitly state that. If not, maybe we can get back to bigger things and leave BamainBoston alone.



Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.