Nihad Awad, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) executive director, is in Turkey this week. It isn’t clear why, but Awad is taking advantage of his travels to post upbeat photographs celebrating that country’s recent failed military coup.
Last month, a faction of Turkey’s military tried to oustIslamist President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who has consolidated power and steered his country away from the secular ambitions laid out by modern founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk toward a decidedly Islamist state.
As Natalie Martin explained in Newsweek:
For almost ten years, Turkey has been drifting towards authoritarianism. Life has become distinctly uncomfortable for anyone who doesn’t support Erdoğan and his party, the AKP. The government controls the news media, has undermined the rule of law and clamped down harshly on any kind of peaceful protest. So while Turkey is still democratic—in that Erdoğan is elected—it is not a liberal country.
Last Friday, Turkish journalist Mahir Zeynalov captured one aspect of Erdoğan’s latest crackdown, the arrests of dozens of journalists, in a series of Twitter posts that garnered immediate international attention.
Awad hasn’t seemed to notice or doesn’t care. On Saturday, heposted a photograph of a bridge where, he said, “the army surrendered to the will of the people.” Monday evening, he snapped a selfiein Turkey’s Taksim Square, showing what looked like a rally of flag-waving Turks “guarding democracy.”
True, Erdoğan waselected presidentby popular vote in 2014. But his actions, seizingopposition media outlets, purging military, the courts and government of potential foes and increasing Islam’s role in Turkish society, predates the failed coup.
But Erdoğan’s crackdown,described by theNew York Times as “nearly unprecedented” in modern history, has not stopped his American Islamist supporters from fully embracing Turkey’s tilt toward a more theocratic state.
In a series of White House rallies that started the night of the failed coup, speakers including Awad cast Turkey as a beacon of freedom.
“This military coup is an affront, not only to the Turkish people, but to everyone who believes in democracy and the free will of the people,” Awad said at another White House rally July 15.
Bedier: What do we want?
Bedier: When do we want it?
Another chant had more trouble catching on:
“Turkey’s what democracy looks like!”
Before the outcome was known, CAIR’s San Francisco chapter director Zahra Billoo wrotethat she “will always support democracy over military coups.” Three days later, she seemed dismissive over calls for restraint in any Turkish reaction. The United States would do the same thing, she wrote.
Billoo is an attorney and serves on the National Lawyers Guild’s board of directors. Yet, she asserts the United States might conduct mass arrests of military personnel, academics and journalists.
Media reports indicate that Turkish troops rounded up for suspicion of being tied to the attempted coup have been tortured.
Amnesty International criticized Erdoğan’s government for accelerating its assault on critics, especially “on a media already weakened by years of government repression.” The latest response “leaves little room for doubt that the authorities are intent on silencing criticism without regard to international law.”
The statement also included a tally illustrating the breadth and severity of Erdoğan’s counter-actions. Among the items:
More than 15,000 people have been detained since the failed coup.
More than 45,000 people have been suspended or removed from their jobs, including police, judges and prosecutors, and others.
Over 1,000 private schools and educational institutions have been closed and 138,000 school children will have to be transferred to state schools
Awad, Bedier and their fellow American Islamists have held their tongues about this systemic abuse, despite their claim of support for human rights. And Awad is actively hyping Turkey as a place worthy of support. Last month, before the coup attempt, wedocumented the close ties between American Islamist groups and Erdoğan.
Awad was photographed with Erdoğan during the Turkish president’s April visit to the United States. A coalition of U.S. Islamist groups, including CAIR, issued a statementin 2015 taking Turkey’s side in the debate over the 1915 massacre of Armenians in Turkey, which rails at any government or entity which dares to call it genocide.
“As Americans, we are concerned about alienating a key ally, Turkey, through one-sided declarations that political and religious leaders have made on this subject,” the statement said.
Erdoğan also has shown love for the founding wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was created in Egypt in 1928 with a goal of restoring a global Islamic state. Turkeyopened its doors to Brotherhood officials chased out of Egypt a coup ousted President Mohamed Morsi, the head of the Muslim Brotherhood’s political party.
Turkey also rolled out a welcome mat for senior leaders of the Hamas military wing, including those responsible for bloody terror attacks. Since early last year, Turkey also has been home to Sami Al-Arian, the former University of South Florida engineering professor who moonlighted on the Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s governing board.
Al-Arian all-but accused Israel of being involved in the coup and defended the resulting government crackdown in an English-language Turkish television interview.
Awad’s involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood in America was exposed by the FBI in 2007 as a result of its investigation of Hamas-financing by the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development.
A telephone list covering members of the Brotherhood’s “Palestine Committee” in the United States included Awad and fellow CAIR officers Omar Ahmad and Nabil Sadoun. This and other evidence linking CAIR to the Brotherhood’s Hamas-support network prompted the FBI to cut off interaction with CAIR “until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS.”
When American Islamists take to social media, or to demonstrations, to support Erdoğan, these connections are at least as relevant as any lip service they may pay to the ideals of democracy. In the end, they are arguing an Erdoğan-style, authoritarian theocracy and democracy are compatible.