December has been an incredibly busy month for Operation Fast and Furious. It all started with Mr. Holder's outburst to The Daily Caller
. Then the DOJ dumped over 1400 pages of documents
on Congress on Friday, December 3rd, which the MSM ignored or buried, but The New York Times quickly spun it
in Mr. Holder's favor. Sharyl Attkisson at CBS shows us documents proving the ATF was using Fast and Furious to get stricter gun laws and the following day Mr. Holder testifies in front of Congress
. Then Fast and Furious was brought up in the debate
Now Mr. Holder and the DOJ are starting to unravel. Mr. Holder's interview with The New York Times
where he called us in the media racist. Last night the DOJ released a statement trying to explain that Mr. Holder didn't use the race card
. Anyone with a 1st grade reading comprehension knows Mr. Holder did call us racist. But the most telling thing to me at least is the Old Media has not reported on this statement. I've been surfing their websites all afternoon and evening and cannot find anything. I would think The New York Times
would be more than happy to publish it, but nothing from them. They were so quick to make Mr. Holder the victim (even putting the article on page A1 of the Sunday edition!) you'd think they'd publish the DOJ statement! You know, gain more sympathy for Mr. Holder. Nothing. Complete silence.
Something interesting happened. On Tuesday CNN's Jack Cafferty brought it up
on his blog and The Situation Room. Not only did he mention Operation Fast and Furious, but he asked if this would be Obama's Watergate. Mr. Cafferty's blog
is very neutral, too, on the operation. I'm incredibly impressed.
Still nothing about the DOJ's statement though. Is it finally catching up Mr. Holder? Is it finally catching up with Old Media? It's a very good thing CNN is talking about it.