A flight of subsidized fancy

J.D. Tuccille has a terrific article over at Reason that illustrates the lunacy of government subsidies mixing with madcap regulatory excess.  Flying into Los Angeles on a small commuter shuttle, Tuccille couldn’t help noticing that half the seats on the damn plane had been ripped out.  

That’s because the flight was part of a heavily regulated, heavily subsidized program called Essential Air Service, which basically forces airlines to provide travel routes that don’t make economic sense.  This particular airfield gets over $2 million a year in taxpayer subsidies.  Of course, the vast majority of people paying the subsidy will never take a single flight on the service they’re paying for.  Heck, the vast majority of them will never set foot in California.

So why rip 10 seats out of a 19-seat commuter plane?  Well, it’s because the Federal Aviation Administration put forth some stiff pilot qualifications last year, requiring a huge amount of flight time for pilots who operate these little turboprop shuttles.  The regulations don’t apply to aircraft with fewer than ten seats.

I know what you’re thinking: No, no, no way, they can’t just be yanking chairs out of a 19-seat airplane until only 9 seats are left, to comply with that regulation.  But oh yes, that’s exactly what they’re doing.  And it works, or else the FAA would have put a stop to it a long time ago.  Same plane + same pilot, minus 10 seats in the passenger compartment = COMPLIANCE!

This would be lunacy outside the sheltering cocoon of taxpayer subsidization, because passenger planes that can only be half-filled by definition can’t turn a profit.  But within the embrace of Big Government, all things are possible, and the consequences fall upon taxpayers who have no idea how badly they’re getting ripped off.

Comment count on this article reflects comments made on Breitbart.com and Facebook. Visit Breitbart's Facebook Page.