Americans believe President Biden is a “weaker” leader for the U.S. military than recent U.S. presidents, and that he has been “less aggressive” than past leaders when it comes to promoting America first with world leaders, a Rasmussen Reports survey released Thursday found.
A plurality of voters view President Biden as a “weaker” commander in chief for the U.S. military compared to recent presidents, a Rasmussen Reports survey released Monday revealed.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said on Wednesday that he will not only be the commander-in-chief, but an “organizer-in-chief” if he becomes President of the United States.
“Donald Trump not only understood the significance of the Army-Navy game and all it stands for in America, but he understands those visual images of him standing with the men and women of the armed services are seen across the world by our friends and enemies alike,” a senior adviser to the president-elect’s campaign tells Breitbart News.
The word “Benghazi” was never mentioned in the first presidential debate. It was mentioned, once, in the second debate. And it was ignored again in the third debate. (The vice presidential debate ignored it, too.)
Donald Trump’s director of social media Dan Scavino Jr. took the NBC poll and shared the results on Twitter, revealing 59 percent of respondents who have taken the poll think Trump won the forum while 41 percent say Hillary Clinton won.
Hillary Clinton dodged the question at the community-in-chief forum of whether she would use military force or negotiations if Iran cheated on the nuclear deal.
At the NBC News “Commander in Chief” forum on Wednesday night aboard the U.S.S. Intrepid in New York, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton invented a new alibi for her mis-handling of classified information, telling host Matt Lauer that she used a secure server when she needed to send classified information.
Trump’s foreign policy address was one of the most effective speeches of his entire campaign — which is why the media are ignoring it.
Do not expect Lauer to ask about Clinton’s email server, or Syria (she called dictator Bashar Assad a “reformer”), or how she took foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while in office. Indeed, expect him to avoid her record.
It would have been unthinkable, 15 years ago, for any American politician to back sending $1.7 billion to Iran’s military. Yet Clinton does. That alone disqualifies her as commander-in-chief.
A report from Media Research Center’s NewsBusters goes in-depth on how Hollywood films and television shows have spent decades subtly preparing American citizens for an inevitable Hillary Clinton presidency.
Michael Hayden, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) says that if Donald Trump were elected president, the U.S. military would deliberately disobey some of the orders that Trump has threatened to issue.
