Impeachment Inquiry Public Hearings Leave Out Two Witnesses with Exculpatory Evidence

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, pauses while giving a statement to members of the media on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2019. The Trump administration barred Gordon Sondland, the U.S. European Union ambassador, from appearing Tuesday before a House panel conducting the impeachment …
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The House Intelligence Committee’s witness list for this week’s public hearings in the “impeachment inquiry” omits two witnesses whose closed-door sessions last month provided exculpatory evidence for President Donald Trump.

It is not clear why they have not been included, or whether they will be called to testify publicly in future. Neither of the two witnesses were on Republicans’ proposed list; they were called by Democrats behind closed doors.

One witness, Catherine Croft, the special adviser at the National Security Council (NSC) for Ukraine negotiations, offered at least two pieces of evidence that tend to help Trump’s argument that he did nothing wrong by asking the Ukrainian president to investigate election interference in 2016 and former Vice President Joe Biden’s past conflict of interest regarding his son, Hunter Biden, who served on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian fossil fuel company.

First, Croft testified that the hold on aid to Ukraine this past summer was not the first. In fact, the White House had held up military aid in late 2017 — partly because of concern about antagonizing Russia (which was the reason the Obama administration had declined to provide military aid), but also because of general concerns about corruption.

In fact, Croft testified, Trump had rebuked then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in front of his delegation:

Croft on Poroshenko (Screenshot / HPSCI)

Second, Croft testified that the Obama administration had been aware of concerns about Hunter Biden and Burisma:

Croft on Burisma (1) (Screenshot / HPSCI)

Croft noted that the issue had come up “in passing,” and that “somebody was sort of annoyed” about it. She also testified that Vice President Biden was “very engaged in Ukraine policy” at the time his son had been appointed.

Croft on Burisma (2) (Screenshot / HPSCI)


Another witness with potentially exculpatory information is Croft’s predecessor, Christopher Anderson. He testified that he was concerned about the involvement of President Trump’s personal attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, because he believed that if Giuliani told the president that there were people in the new Ukrainian government who opposed him, that could cause the U.S. to weaken its support for Ukraine, which could embolden Russia.

However, Anderson also confirmed that there were concerns within the Obama administration about Hunter Biden serving on the board of Burisma:

Anderson on Burisma (Screenshot / HPSCI)

Another witness, Under Secretary of State for Diplomatic Affairs David Hale, is scheduled to testify this week even though his transcript has not been released.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social Studies and Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard College, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

.

Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.