KASSAM: Just Like Brexit’s Cry Babies The Protesters Will Disappear, But Something Worse Will Replace Them

GettyImages-622118094
Getty

Immediately following the Brexit vote in June, Remain protesters took to the streets of London to demand the nullification of the vote.

“We are the 48 per cent!” they cried, simultaneously acknowledging their minority status while drastically revising down their estimations of themselves from 2011, when many of them were part of the Occupy protests chanting “we are the 99 per cent”.

But soon enough, the protests subsided. In part, those participating got bored. But what should be concerning to the likes of President-elect Donald Trump is the far more nefarious activity that has risen up in its place.

People hold up pro-Europe placards and European flags as thousands of protesters take part in a March for Europe, through the centre of London on July 2, 2016, to protest against Britain's vote to leave the EU, which has plunged the government into political turmoil and left the country deeply polarised. Protesters from a variety of movements march from Park Lane to Parliament Square to show solidarity with those looking to create a more positive, inclusive kinder Britain in Europe. / AFP / Niklas HALLE'N (Photo credit should read NIKLAS HALLE'N/AFP/Getty Images)

People hold up pro-Europe placards and European flags as thousands of protesters take part in a March for Europe, through the centre of London on July 2, 2016, to protest against Britain’s vote to leave the EU (NIKLAS HALLE’N/AFP/Getty Images)

For the left — which is far more organised when it comes to matters of usurping people and taking over institutions — protests are little but a forerunner or sometimes just a smokescreen. It is a “holding pattern” while they get their house in order.

Which is why the protests sprung up immediately after the U.S. election, right on cue, and hardly grassroots inspired.

People march and shout during an anti-Trump protest in Oakland, California on November 9, 2016. Thousands of protesters rallied across the United States expressing shock and anger over Donald Trump's election, vowing to oppose divisive views they say helped the Republican billionaire win the presidency. / AFP / Josh Edelson (Photo credit should read JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images)

People march and shout during an anti-Trump protest in Oakland, California on November 9, 2016 (JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images)

And it is also why on the morning of Friday, November 11th, you had Senator Jeff Merkeley (D) tell CNN: “On many of his ideas, for example ignoring religious freedom in America, and setting up religious tests for people entering the country, we will oppose him. We celebrate the diversity of America. We celebrate our constitutional vision of religious freedom, and so, some of the ideas that trump has put forward we’ll vigorously oppose within the chamber of the Senate and House”.

So far, so expected.

But when asked: “Since you’re not the party in control… how will you actually stop what he wants to do?” the establishment tactics were, perhaps accidentally, revealed.

Sen. Merkeley responded: “Certainly for many of these ideas, it’s going to be many of our colleagues across the aisle who also do not share the precise vision that or every element of the vision that Trump put forward during his campaign. 

“I will tell you one of the things I’m very concerned about is the Supreme Court seat. The appointment of this seat rightly belongs in the hands of President Obama. What the majority in the Senate has done is to basically steal that from one presidency and try to deliver it to another, which is going to greatly and profoundly affect the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. And that’s doing major damage to an essential institution in our constitutional vision”.

Do you see what the Senator did there? It was basically the same thing the Democrats were goading Donald Trump about before the election. Hell, I even got quizzed about it by establishment journalists in London. The “legitimacy” of U.S. institutions is now being called into question just because Hillary Clinton lost the election.

And not just any old institution: arguably the most important in the U.S. system of government, the Supreme Court.

In Britain, the establishment moved to undermine the legitimacy of direct democracy, of the referendum itself, not just by shifting the balance of power to a Remain campaigner-led government, but also in their latest ruse, by using the High Court to toss the decision back to a Remain-centric House of Commons.

LONDON, ENGLAND - NOVEMBER 03: Founding partner of SCM Private LLP Gina Miller (C) leaves after the High Court decides that the Prime Minister cannot trigger Brexit without the approval of the MP's at The Royal Courts Of Justice on November 3, 2016 in London, England. Leading legal figures have been arguing the historic case after some MP's called for Parliament to be given a vote before article 50 is triggered. Their case is backed by investment manager Gina Miller and Article 50 author, Lord Kerr of Kinlochard. The announcement was made by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, Master of the Rolls Sir Terence Etherton and Lord Justice Sales. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

LONDON, ENGLAND – NOVEMBER 03: Anti-Brexit establishment representative Gina Miller (C) leaves after the High Court decides that the Prime Minister cannot trigger Brexit without the approval of the (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

In the United States, the protests will soon subside and give rise to something far more dangerous.

And just like the the protesters themselves: if the establishment has to tear down everything around it in order to re-establish its control, it will. President-elect Donald Trump will need to safeguard against this, and plans to combat such tactics must be devised right now.

Follow Raheem Kassam on Twitter for updates

COMMENTS

Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.