Former FBI general counsel James A. Baker testified Thursday that former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann told him that he was not working for a client when conveying claims Donald Trump was colluding with Russia.
The testimony is crucial to Special Counsel John H. Durham’s case against Sussmann, who alleged that Trump was linked to Russia via Alfa Bank. The FBI investigated the claim and found it to be baseless.
Durham’s prosecutors have claimed in court that Sussmann intended to reveal an “October surprise” against Trump in the 2016 election. Indeed, Clinton aide — now National Security Advisor — Jake Sullivan issued a statement about the allegations that Clinton tweeted in October 2016.
Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank. pic.twitter.com/8f8n9xMzUU
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 1, 2016
That tweet came just days after then-FBI Director James Comey announced that he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s improper use of a private email server during her time as Secretary of State, and just days before the election itself.
Already, in pre-trial motions, Durham had revealed the existence of a text message from Sussmann to Baker asking for an urgent meeting, and adding: “I’m coming on my own – not on behalf of a client or company – want to help the Bureau.”
On Thursday, Baker authenticated that message and added additional testimony, which corroborated testimony from earlier witnesses from the FBI, who all said that they believed or had been told that Sussmann was operating on his own.
Sussmann was allegedly working for the Clinton campaign at the time, and allegedly concealed that knowledge.
As the New York Post notes, the result of Sussmann’s alleged lie was that the FBI considered him a trusted confidential source, which in turn meant that the FBI did not further investigate to determine the source of Sussmann’s information.
John Haughey of the Epoch Times also noted that Sussmann’s alleged lie meant that others within the FBI were more inclined to regard him as a credible source.
When Baker met Priestap after Sussmann meeting, “I repeated that Michael said he was not there to represent a client.” He wanted Sussmann regarded as a “confidential human source” so “Bill would know who Michael was and take Michael as seriously as I did, too.” #SussmannTrial
— John Haughey (@JFHaughey58) May 19, 2022
Judge Christopher Cooper, a Barack Obama appointee, has been criticized for a number of decisions favorable to the defense, including refusing to eliminate jurors who have donated to Democrats. On Thursday, the judge refused to remove a juror whose daughter participates on the same high school rowing team as Sussmann’s daughter.
Baker was previously investigated for alleged unauthorized leaks of information from the FBIO to the media.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
COMMENTS
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.