Judge Rules Arizona Senate Can Access 2.1 Million 2020 Election Ballots and Equipment

Court of Justice, Law and Rule Concept, Judge's Gavel on The Table.
iStock / Getty Images Plus

A judge ruled Friday that the Arizona Senate may access 2.1 million ballots and election equipment from the state’s most populous county to audit results from the 2020 election.

“Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Timothy Thomason’s decision comes after a protracted battled between the Republican-controlled state Senate and the GOP-dominated Maricopa County board over subpoenas issued by the Senate,” the Associated Press (AP) reported.

The Board of Supervisors argued the ballots were secret, the Legislature “had no right to access them,” and the subpoenas Senate President Karen Fann issued were “for an illegitimate purpose.”

“The Senate’s lawyers contended that the constitution gives the Legislature the role of maintaining the purity of elections and make sure voter integrity is protected, that the subpoenas were legal and a proper use of legislative power,” the article said.

Judge Thomason agreed with the Senate and called the subpoenas “legal and enforceable” in his ruling.

“There is no question that the Senators have the power to issue legislative subpoenas,” the judge wrote. “The Subpoenas comply with the statutory requirements for legislative subpoenas. The Senate also has broad constitutional power to oversee elections.”

In a statement Friday, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman Jack Sellers said the county “will immediately start working to provide the Arizona Senate with the ballots and other materials.”

“We hope senators will show the same respect and care we have for the 2.1 million private ballots and use them in service of their legislative duties,” he added.

When the Supreme Court decided last week, by one vote, to hear none of the 2020 election cases regarding issues of voter fraud and illegal votes, Justice Clarence Thomas declared, “Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

“For more than a century, this Court has recognized that the Constitution operates as a limitation upon the State in respect of any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power to regulate federal elections,” he continued.

“Because the Federal Constitution, not state constitutions, gives state legislatures authority to regulate federal elections, petitioners presented a strong argument that the [State] Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision violated the Constitution by overriding the clearly expressed intent of the legislature.”

“But elections enable self-governance only when they include processes that give citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election,” Thomas added.

In November, three Arizona Republicans — Reps. Andy Biggs, Paul Gosar, and David Schweikert — called for an audit of the ballots in Maricopa County due to what they described as issues regarding the “integrity” of the state’s “election systems,” Breitbart News reported.

“Americans and Arizonans must have full confidence in our election processes and systems in order to maintain the bedrock of our constitutional republic,” Biggs said at the time.


Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.