Critics of the latest federal climate change assessment, including scientists, have slammed it as “exaggeration” with “false” conclusions.

The co-author of a much-hyped, peer-reviewed, alarmist paper claiming to have found a huge, unexpected build-up of global warming heat in the oceans has admitted: “We really muffed” the calculations.

If you thought the Great War, Stalin’s Purges or the Holocaust were bad, think Again. They pale in comparison with climate change, which the United Nations has dubbed “the greatest threat we have ever faced.”

Climate alarmists have finally admitted that they’ve got it wrong on global warming. This is the inescapable conclusion of a landmark paper, published in Nature Geoscience, which finally admits that the computer models have overstated the impact of carbon dioxide on climate and that the planet is warming more slowly than predicted.

According to the latest panic attack from climate alarmists, the production of four major crops—maize, wheat, rice and soybeans—will fall by 23 percent by the 2050s thanks to global warming.

There is no shortage of news stories touting the splits within each party. But when it comes to energy issues, each party is already unified—though in different ways.

The climate alarmists have come up with a brilliant new excuse to explain why there has been no “global warming” for nearly 19 years. Turns out the satellite data is lying. And to prove it they’ve come up with a glossy